#加密货币监管框架 New Chair Selig is taking office, shifting from the SEC's "aggressive enforcement" to the CFTC's "heavy regulation"—this signal is really worth pondering. After years in crypto, I've seen too many projects grow wildly in regulatory gray areas, only to get blacklisted overnight.
Rules are more terrifying than enforcement, you need to understand that. Enforcement punishes bad things that have already happened, while rules tell you from the outset what you can and cannot do. This means future projects will need approval before launch, rather than issuing tokens first and dealing with consequences later if caught. For retail investors, this is actually good news—it reduces the probability of completely fraudulent projects directly rugging.
But what does this mean? Volatility may get compressed, and opportunities from information asymmetry will become increasingly rare. I've seen too many people enter with the mentality of "early positioning and skyrocketing," only to get completely liquidated. Those who've survived long term find opportunities within the regulatory framework, not by betting on regulatory loopholes.
Selig emphasizes consolidating America's position as the global crypto center, which indicates the policy direction is embrace rather than suppression. Instead of constantly asking "when will it bounce back," you should start now learning what compliant projects look like, developing the ability to identify which ones have real lifecycle value and which are just market maker schemes. Surviving long term is a hundred times more important than making quick profits.
#加密货币监管框架 New Chair Selig is taking office, shifting from the SEC's "aggressive enforcement" to the CFTC's "heavy regulation"—this signal is really worth pondering. After years in crypto, I've seen too many projects grow wildly in regulatory gray areas, only to get blacklisted overnight.
Rules are more terrifying than enforcement, you need to understand that. Enforcement punishes bad things that have already happened, while rules tell you from the outset what you can and cannot do. This means future projects will need approval before launch, rather than issuing tokens first and dealing with consequences later if caught. For retail investors, this is actually good news—it reduces the probability of completely fraudulent projects directly rugging.
But what does this mean? Volatility may get compressed, and opportunities from information asymmetry will become increasingly rare. I've seen too many people enter with the mentality of "early positioning and skyrocketing," only to get completely liquidated. Those who've survived long term find opportunities within the regulatory framework, not by betting on regulatory loopholes.
Selig emphasizes consolidating America's position as the global crypto center, which indicates the policy direction is embrace rather than suppression. Instead of constantly asking "when will it bounce back," you should start now learning what compliant projects look like, developing the ability to identify which ones have real lifecycle value and which are just market maker schemes. Surviving long term is a hundred times more important than making quick profits.