Nasdaq triggered the "double top" pattern, and the BTC 200-day SMA support level of $82,587 is under threat

DailyNews
BTC1,05%

Odaily Planet Daily News Ecoinometrics research services pointed out that the long-term recovery of BTC (BTC) is closely related to the performance of the Nasdaq, and there is a significant positive correlation between the two. However, Nasdaq triggered a “double top” pattern on Monday, which means that the 200-day simple moving average (SMA) support level of BTC may face pressure. BTC has fallen by more than 10% in the past 24 hours, after briefly surpassing $95,000. In the early session, the price tested the 200-day SMA support level at $82,587. The 200-day SMA is typically seen as an important indicator of long-term trends, with a break below this level often seen as a signal of potential significant losses. Due to the 2.2% decline in the Nasdaq, the ‘double top’ pattern has been triggered, and the possibility of BTC falling below the 200-day SMA cannot be ignored. According to technical analysis theory, the subsequent decline in the double top pattern may reach 70% between the peaks and valleys, which means that the Nasdaq may fall to 19,400 points. The next support level for BTC may be at $73,757. (CoinDesk)

View Original
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to Disclaimer.
Comment
0/400
GateUser-850b92b3vip
· 2025-03-04 14:17
Bears
View OriginalReply0