Deterministic finality—does it actually matter for institutional adoption? There's a network claiming 97,000+ TPS with built-in audit trails designed specifically for fund administration at scale.



When you're managing billions in assets, non-deterministic consensus creates reconciliation nightmares. But if every transaction reaches irreversible finality immediately, suddenly you've got workflows that compliance teams can actually verify without custom infrastructure.

The real question: can these performance numbers hold under production load, or are we looking at another testnet fantasy? Anyone stress-tested similar architectures?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
CounterIndicatorvip
· 12-08 23:55
97,000 TPS sounds impressive, but who would dare to bet on it in a real production environment?
View OriginalReply0
UncleLiquidationvip
· 12-08 23:49
97,000 TPS sounds impressive, but running it in a production environment is a whole different story... Have the stress test results come out yet?
View OriginalReply0
TerraNeverForgetvip
· 12-08 23:42
97,000 TPS? Uh, using testnet data to make such claims really makes me laugh, haha.
View OriginalReply0
ApeWithAPlanvip
· 12-08 23:32
97k TPS sounds unbelievable. Only being able to achieve that in a production environment counts as real capability. I’ve seen too much hype on testnets. Can you share any real-world cases?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)