Recently, I heavily invested in CRCL, and many people have asked me why.



To be honest, this decision was made after repeated deliberation. Most analyses of CRCL in the market stay at the surface—either copying traditional valuation models or simply benchmarking against other stablecoin projects. But I think these frameworks simply don’t fit.

CRCL’s underlying logic is different from conventional projects. It’s not about copying something, but about finding new growth points for the US dollar and US debt systems. Once this positioning is stabilized, the potential for imagination is fully unlocked.

Of course, heavy positioning is not blind rushing. I’ve gone through all the doubts I could think of, and the more I look at it, the more I feel the current market is undervaluing this project’s potential. Many people might still be viewing new things with old perspectives, but opportunities often hide in cognitive gaps.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
VibesOverChartsvip
· 12-11 13:28
Oh, another cognitive bias cascade... But honestly, no one has really dug deep into the U.S. debt system.
View OriginalReply0
MindsetExpandervip
· 12-11 07:02
Haha, this level of understanding is pretty good, but to be honest, I still need to look at more data before I can join in. Diving heavily into a position definitely shows courage, but this logic of finding growth points in US bonds... can it really hold up? In the stablecoin sector, this bunch of projects all claim to be different, but in the end... how did you all turn out? I won't deny that you might have seen something others haven't, but this kind of "market undervaluation" argument sounds a bit familiar.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentTherapistvip
· 12-11 06:54
Wow, a new growth point for the US dollar and US Treasuries? I haven't heard this perspective before, but it doesn't necessarily mean you have to hold a heavy position. Cognitive gaps are indeed where profits can be made; I'm just worried that gaps in cognition might eventually turn into misunderstandings. By the way, have you stress-tested the risk? Really?
View OriginalReply0
OldLeekNewSicklevip
· 12-11 06:54
It's that same old "cognitive gap" spiel again, I've heard it a bit too many times.
View OriginalReply0
rekt_but_vibingvip
· 12-11 06:54
I think your logic has some merit, but to be honest, did you really review the risk model thoroughly before heavy positioning? Undervaluation ≠ guaranteed to take off; these are two different things.
View OriginalReply0
SerRugResistantvip
· 12-11 06:37
Haha, another person trying to buy the dip. Lack of awareness, huh? Everyone can say that phrase now. Wait, a new growth point in the US debt system? Why does this logic feel so familiar, it seems like every project talks about it this way. But to be fair, those who really dare to hold heavy positions do have some skills—they're just betting pretty aggressively.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)