2025-12-11 23:47:29

The White House just dropped an executive order that basically tells states to back off from crafting their own AI regulations. Tech giants have been lobbying hard for this—they want federal rules instead of dealing with a patchwork of state laws.

This move is a massive win for Silicon Valley executives who've been arguing that state-by-state regulations would strangle innovation. The order prioritizes a unified federal approach, which could reshape how AI development gets governed across the country.

For the broader tech and crypto space, this signals where the administration stands: light-touch regulation favoring industry flexibility over localized control. Whether that's good news or a regulatory red flag depends on where you sit.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

20 Likes

Reward
20
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SerumSquirter

· 5h ago

Silicon Valley wins again, now the state government has to shut up haha --- Is a one-size-fits-all federal approach good? The only fear is that the rules might become even stricter than all the states combined --- Light regulation sounds great, but isn’t that exactly what tech giants want... --- Oh, it’s the same old story, talking about flexibility when really it just means doing whatever they want --- Now the crypto circle can breathe a sigh of relief, but I still feel a bit cautious --- Has the White House really become Silicon Valley’s mouthpiece? Directly overriding the power of state governments... --- In my opinion, unified rules might seem fair, but the initiative is entirely in the hands of the big players --- Wow, so local protectionism actually ended up protecting us? Now I feel like something is missing --- Light regulation = lying flat, I really don’t understand this logic --- But to be fair, the fragmented state laws are indeed annoying, and I can’t really argue against this move

View OriginalReply0

just_vibin_onchain

· 12-12 00:15

Silicon Valley wins big, retail investors are still debating regulation --- It's the old federal vs. state drama again, basically big companies don't want to be restricted --- Light regulation sounds good, but who can guarantee that those federal folks won't change their minds --- Really, crypto is following this pattern too, in the end, it's still a one-size-fits-all approach --- Wait, isn't this good for the on-chain ecosystem... or did I understand it wrong --- Can someone explain whether this is an opportunity or a trap? Feels like I’ve been led astray

View OriginalReply0

AllTalkLongTrader

· 12-12 00:13

Silicon Valley wins again, retail investors lose again, this routine is so familiar Federal unification... Basically, it means lighter regulations, and tech giants are cheering Now it's easier to do sneaky stuff, since there are fewer fragmented restrictions Wait, isn't this a good thing for the crypto world? Fewer state-level compliance nightmares... But I feel like... they are paving the way for big capital Is this truly light regulation, or just a new way to harvest? I wouldn't be surprised if the federal government finally adds a global ban in the end Industry flexibility? Come on, this is just the game rules set by the big players

View OriginalReply0

BoredWatcher

· 12-11 23:52

Silicon Valley has won again, the state government has been sidelined. This is modern-day America.

View OriginalReply0

Trending TopicsView More
#GateNovTransparencyReportReleased
17.52K Popularity
#FedRateCutComing
669.5K Popularity
#PostonSquaretoEarn$50
65.1K Popularity
#BitcoinActivityPicksUp
18.04K Popularity
#CryptoMarketRebound
509.29K Popularity

Hot Gate FunView More

1
ottomanOttoman
MC:$3.6KHolders:1
0.00%
2
GGGATEGUARD
MC:$3.61KHolders:1
0.00%
3
longwei龙卫
MC:$3.6KHolders:1
0.00%
4
拼好饭拼好饭
MC:$3.69KHolders:2
0.00%
5
666拼好饭
MC:$3.64KHolders:2
0.04%

Sitemap