Camp Network’s mainnet went live with significant fanfare—a $30 million-funded L1 project aimed at tackling AI copyright chaos. The token trading and airdrop claim opened simultaneously, but what unfolded instead was a nightmare scenario for early participants.
The Eligibility Crisis: 6 Million Testers, Only 40,000 Qualify
The numbers tell a brutal story. According to on-chain data, approximately 6 million wallets interacted with Camp Network’s testnet. Among the 280,000 active participants in the Summit Series program, only 40,000 addresses became eligible for airdrops. For the hundreds of thousands who diligently completed testnet tasks expecting rewards, the result was devastating—complete ineligibility.
This raises the first red flag: Why participate for months if the vast majority face exclusion?
The Hidden Cost Barrier: Trading Before Claiming
Here’s where the controversy deepens. Even the lucky 40,000 who qualified faced an additional hurdle: they needed to spend money buying CAMP tokens on exchanges first to cover gas fees for the airdrop claim itself. This inverted logic—requiring token purchase before airdrop access—set Camp Network apart as the first mainstream L1 to impose such conditions.
The math didn’t help either. Early recipients found only 20% of their airdrop unlocked at TGE. A user receiving 100 CAMP tokens could claim just 20 tokens initially, worth approximately $0.20 at current prices ($0.01 per token based on December 2025 data). Hardly “a meal of pig trotters” as many had joked during testnet participation.
The KYC Gatekeeping Effect
Adding another layer of friction, strict KYC verification with camera requirements and VPN blocks excluded numerous international users from even initiating claims. For a blockchain project claiming decentralization, such barriers felt contradictory and restrictive.
The Registration Fee Fiasco
Initially, Camp Network demanded 0.0025 ETH (~$10) as a registration fee before claim confirmation. The community backlash was immediate and intense. Within hours, the project hastily reversed course, canceling the fee and promising refunds. This sudden reversal exposed poor initial planning and eroded user trust.
The Withdrawal Problem Nobody Expected
Some exchanges listing CAMP couldn’t facilitate withdrawals, trapping token liquidity and preventing users from managing their assets. Combined with the requirement to buy tokens first, this created a circular problem that frustrated participants.
Why This Matters Beyond Camp
Camp Network’s airdrop structure demonstrates how even well-funded projects can bungle token distribution through poorly designed incentive mechanisms. The layered restrictions—eligibility gaps, mandatory spending, KYC barriers, unlock limitations, and exchange restrictions—created a perfect storm of frustration.
Current metrics show CAMP trading at $0.01 with a $14.93M circulating market cap. Whether this represents a bottom or further downside remains uncertain. The reputational damage, however, is already priced in.
The lesson: Before rushing into any airdrop claim, verify eligibility, understand all fees (including hidden ones), check exchange withdrawal capabilities, and assess the unlock schedule carefully. Emotion-driven participation in airdrops often leads to disappointment—this time, Camp Network proved that point conclusively.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Why Can't 'Haircut Hunters' Get Their Airdrop? Camp Network's Launch Becomes Cautionary Tale
Camp Network’s mainnet went live with significant fanfare—a $30 million-funded L1 project aimed at tackling AI copyright chaos. The token trading and airdrop claim opened simultaneously, but what unfolded instead was a nightmare scenario for early participants.
The Eligibility Crisis: 6 Million Testers, Only 40,000 Qualify
The numbers tell a brutal story. According to on-chain data, approximately 6 million wallets interacted with Camp Network’s testnet. Among the 280,000 active participants in the Summit Series program, only 40,000 addresses became eligible for airdrops. For the hundreds of thousands who diligently completed testnet tasks expecting rewards, the result was devastating—complete ineligibility.
This raises the first red flag: Why participate for months if the vast majority face exclusion?
The Hidden Cost Barrier: Trading Before Claiming
Here’s where the controversy deepens. Even the lucky 40,000 who qualified faced an additional hurdle: they needed to spend money buying CAMP tokens on exchanges first to cover gas fees for the airdrop claim itself. This inverted logic—requiring token purchase before airdrop access—set Camp Network apart as the first mainstream L1 to impose such conditions.
The math didn’t help either. Early recipients found only 20% of their airdrop unlocked at TGE. A user receiving 100 CAMP tokens could claim just 20 tokens initially, worth approximately $0.20 at current prices ($0.01 per token based on December 2025 data). Hardly “a meal of pig trotters” as many had joked during testnet participation.
The KYC Gatekeeping Effect
Adding another layer of friction, strict KYC verification with camera requirements and VPN blocks excluded numerous international users from even initiating claims. For a blockchain project claiming decentralization, such barriers felt contradictory and restrictive.
The Registration Fee Fiasco
Initially, Camp Network demanded 0.0025 ETH (~$10) as a registration fee before claim confirmation. The community backlash was immediate and intense. Within hours, the project hastily reversed course, canceling the fee and promising refunds. This sudden reversal exposed poor initial planning and eroded user trust.
The Withdrawal Problem Nobody Expected
Some exchanges listing CAMP couldn’t facilitate withdrawals, trapping token liquidity and preventing users from managing their assets. Combined with the requirement to buy tokens first, this created a circular problem that frustrated participants.
Why This Matters Beyond Camp
Camp Network’s airdrop structure demonstrates how even well-funded projects can bungle token distribution through poorly designed incentive mechanisms. The layered restrictions—eligibility gaps, mandatory spending, KYC barriers, unlock limitations, and exchange restrictions—created a perfect storm of frustration.
Current metrics show CAMP trading at $0.01 with a $14.93M circulating market cap. Whether this represents a bottom or further downside remains uncertain. The reputational damage, however, is already priced in.
The lesson: Before rushing into any airdrop claim, verify eligibility, understand all fees (including hidden ones), check exchange withdrawal capabilities, and assess the unlock schedule carefully. Emotion-driven participation in airdrops often leads to disappointment—this time, Camp Network proved that point conclusively.