There's a timeless wisdom in this: when people choose to stay out of governance and decision-making, they inevitably end up ruled by those less capable than themselves. It's not just a historical observation—it applies directly to how communities operate today, whether in traditional systems or decentralized networks. Apathy toward participation always comes with a price. The ones who show up, who engage, who voice their positions—they shape the outcome. So if you care about the direction things take, stepping back isn't really an option. —Ancient wisdom, still relevant
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
21 Likes
Reward
21
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ForkLibertarian
· 8h ago
That's right, but the reality is that most people are too lazy to participate, and then they complain about being cut off.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketSunriser
· 01-05 00:56
That's so true, it's the same in the crypto world... Those who don't participate in governance end up being harvested by a few people, just thinking about it is terrifying.
View OriginalReply0
shadowy_supercoder
· 01-05 00:55
ngl that's why so many people end up having their fate decided by a minority... really speechless
View OriginalReply0
FlashLoanLarry
· 01-05 00:49
ngl this is why the voting power in the DAO is taken over by the big players... people who are too lazy to participate deserve to be cut off
View OriginalReply0
OnchainDetective
· 01-05 00:47
I guessed this sentence a long time ago. Just look at those DAO governance — in communities with low participation, the voting power is monopolized by a few whales and active addresses. According to on-chain data, most token holders don't even vote, and in the end, a few people make decisions to harvest the profits. It's a typical power vacuum phenomenon.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-00be86fc
· 01-05 00:27
That's right, but the key is that most people are completely unaware of who is actually ruling over them.
There's a timeless wisdom in this: when people choose to stay out of governance and decision-making, they inevitably end up ruled by those less capable than themselves. It's not just a historical observation—it applies directly to how communities operate today, whether in traditional systems or decentralized networks. Apathy toward participation always comes with a price. The ones who show up, who engage, who voice their positions—they shape the outcome. So if you care about the direction things take, stepping back isn't really an option. —Ancient wisdom, still relevant