When a city allocates just $18 million to housing out of a $115 billion total budget, you start wondering where the priorities actually lie. That's roughly 0.016%—pocket change in the grand scheme. Recently compiled county-level budget breakdowns and began itemizing expenditures by department and allocation amounts. The numbers tell a fascinating story about government resource distribution. Question is: does traditional financial infrastructure deploying trillions actually solve fundamental problems, or are we just recycling the same old inefficiencies at scale? Worth digging into the data yourself.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropHunterZhangvip
· 19h ago
0.016% house budget? Ha, I just remembered the token allocation ratio of a certain project before... same old tricks, same way of cutting.
View OriginalReply0
BearWhisperGodvip
· 01-05 01:55
0.016%? Laughable, this is what they call "prioritizing people's livelihood"
View OriginalReply0
DeepRabbitHolevip
· 01-05 01:41
18 billion invested elsewhere, housing only gets 0.016%, isn't this just giving up?
View OriginalReply0
NFTArchaeologisvip
· 01-05 01:31
Budget figures can be deceptive, just like those incorrectly labeled numerical artifacts.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)