Have you ever wondered why your stop-loss orders seem to always be precisely targeted?



In simple terms, this boils down to one word: liquidity. This factor essentially determines 90% of your profit and loss outcomes.

The routines of ordinary traders are quite similar—buy at support levels, sell at resistance levels. The problem is, institutional traders have long targeted your stop-loss orders. They are not competing with the market; they are playing a game with your order book.

**What exactly is liquidity?**

A simple understanding is order volume. Especially those orders accumulated in the form of stop-losses. They are usually concentrated in two places: support and resistance levels, and near ascending/descending trend lines.

What does the standard textbook approach suggest? Sell at resistance, set stop-losses above the high points. It sounds correct, but this is exactly the scenario institutions want to see.

**How do institutions extract liquidity?**

Imagine you need to liquidate contracts worth millions of dollars. Placing sell orders directly below resistance? Not realistic. Your large order would crash the market, resulting in a terrible execution price.

A smarter approach is the opposite. When the price breaks through resistance upward, all stop-loss buy orders and breakout orders are activated. As large buy orders flood in, institutions quietly complete massive sell orders and can get better prices. Then what happens? A false breakout forms, and after draining liquidity, the market reverses and crashes down.

**The trap game in supply zones**

When a double top or equal high forms within a supply zone, don’t rush to act. Why? Liquidity inducement. The market will first push through these highs, clearing out all stop-losses, before truly declining. As a result, you get perfectly stopped out, even if your directional judgment was correct.

Things can get even more complicated. When multiple potential supply zones appear simultaneously, the market might ignore the first area altogether and jump to a higher level to attract liquidity.

**How to avoid the trap**

Blindly placing orders in supply and demand zones needs to change. Watch the market movements more carefully, use standard confirmation models to verify true intentions, and don’t let yourself become the liquidity being slaughtered.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ShibaSunglassesvip
· 01-08 02:22
Once again, I've been precisely targeted. Damn, this time my stop-loss point was set perfectly. The institutions are really just playing us; the order book is their hunting ground. What they said this time is right; the support and resistance levels have long been played out. I've also fallen into the trap at the double top; false breakouts take you out in one move. I need to change my trading approach; I can't keep going in so aggressively.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterLuckyvip
· 01-07 12:32
I'm really at my wit's end now. Why do my stop-loss orders always get sliced through in the middle? Turns out it's all just tricks used by these institutions. I've sensed something was off for a while. The idea of buying at support levels and selling at resistance levels sounds reasonable, but every time I get exploited. Now I finally understand. The key is to see where the liquidity is accumulating. Don't be foolish and follow the textbook blindly; these institutions have long figured out our way of thinking. It's really just a psychological game. They're just waiting for you to queue up and hit your stop-loss. This analysis is excellent. I finally don't have to be a passive victim of liquidity slaughter anymore.
View OriginalReply0
DegenWhisperervip
· 01-05 07:58
Oh no, I got sniped again. Now I understand, it's really been messed up by the institutions.
View OriginalReply0
GasGuzzlervip
· 01-05 07:52
Oh, I've seen this trick before, and I still fall for it. Institutions rely on our stop-loss orders to make a profit, it's really annoying. Exactly, the support and resistance levels are all traps. It's ridiculous how I'm always cleared out at double tops. Liquidity inducement is really ruthless, directly exposing the stop-loss set-up. It's actually about waiting for a breakout confirmation, don't rush to ambush.
View OriginalReply0
FrogInTheWellvip
· 01-05 07:45
Once again, liquidity has been drained, it's really incredible. Stop-loss orders are just like gambling in a casino. Machine: Institutions are basically slaughtering retail investors. Our small orders are just a joke in front of them. Machine: It seems I need to change my strategy. I can't keep operating so foolishly according to the textbook. Machine: Double tops, supply zones—these are all traps. The market doesn't play by the usual rules. Machine: Liquidity hunters are truly unbeatable. We can never win in this game.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)