2026-01-06 00:40:33

#2026年比特币行情展望 Real Bills Under Tariff Policies: Data Speaks

Recent discussions about tariff policies have been lively, but the truth behind the numbers is often overlooked. 📊

Reality VS Expectations: A Huge Gap
Official disclosures show that actual revenue in the first 11 months was only 236.2 billion, far below the expected 600 billion. Where did the 600 billion come from? The finance minister admitted—it’s a cumulative forecast for multiple years into the future, and subsequent revenue will decline year by year.

Who Ultimately Pays the Bill?
Costs don’t just disappear; they have to come from somewhere. After a 33% increase in corporate costs, most of the pressure was directly passed on to consumers. Meanwhile, global trade growth expectations have been downgraded by major international organizations, with U.S. economic growth expected to be lowered by 2.1 percentage points—that’s a heavy blow to the traditional economy.

Black Swan Events Are Brewing
Relevant rulings by the Supreme Court could become turning points. If the ruling is unfavorable, billions in tax refunds and policy adjustments could be within the realm of possibility.

In plain terms, the costs of this tariff policy experiment are being spread across society. For those making financial decisions or holding assets, understanding these macroeconomic logics is crucial. 🔍

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

20 Likes

Reward
20
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GateUser-c799715c

· 01-09 00:23

236.2 billion vs 600 billion, the price difference is just too outrageous. No wonder some people are starting to bet on crypto assets.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunterKing

· 01-06 05:52

600 billion hype, 236.2 billion actual implementation, the gap is just too huge... Consumers are again the ones to blame.

View OriginalReply0

DeFiChef

· 01-06 01:02

It's the same old trick again, 236.2 billion vs 600 billion, enough already. I see through this number game. Companies shift costs onto consumers, but in the end, it's us who bear the brunt—just like how the crypto圈 gets割韭菜. Only after the Supreme Court delivers the final verdict will the real plot twist happen.

View OriginalReply0

TrustlessMaximalist

· 01-06 01:02

2.362 trillion versus 6 trillion, that's almost like the official magic😅 number game played so skillfully --- Damn, once again consumers have to bear the costs. I've seen this trick way too many times --- If the Supreme Court's decision comes down hard, thousands of billions could disappear instantly, and the crypto market will have to tremble along --- Tariffs are essentially about diversifying risk. We coin holders need to see this clearly --- Wait, is the 6 trillion actually a projection for the coming years? That means there's basically no profit made right now --- Corporate costs +33% directly passed onto us, with the economy downgraded by 2.1 percentage points—so heartbreaking --- Feels like a black swan is coming, this is the real thing to watch out for --- Is the data speaking? All this data is just lies... --- Brothers still holding traditional assets, you really need to check this out, seriously --- So this is why you need to allocate some alternative assets, don’t put everything in one basket

View OriginalReply0

RugpullAlertOfficer

· 01-06 00:59

236.2 billion versus 600 billion? That's way off. The finance minister's recent move is really a bit outrageous.

View OriginalReply0