2026-01-08 19:23:37

The core logic of a certain emerging Web3 project AIXC is actually quite straightforward—turning their own assets into RWA tokenization solutions. Essentially, this is a highly capitalized financing innovation, but it doesn't address industry-wide common problems. Instead, it seems more like solving a long-standing financing issue by attracting new capital inflows through on-chain asset securitization. This model is not new in Web3; the key still depends on actual implementation capability and market acceptance. Packaging assets on-chain as concepts can indeed attract attention, but ultimately investors need to see whether the project can generate real cash flow, rather than just stopping at fundraising itself. This approach has been used in DeFi and NFT projects for a long time, and everyone can see how it turned out.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

20 Likes

Reward
20
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MindsetExpander

· 9h ago

Same old story. No matter how fancy the RWA concept is packaged, it's still a relay race for funding—whoever takes the last step loses out. Basically, it's bringing the funding difficulties onto the chain, thinking that blockchain alone can solve real-world problems? Laughable. Cash flow is the real secret. Didn't see through the DeFi wave before? Now they're doing RWA again. Does the industry have such a short memory? Asset securitization itself isn't a problem; the key is whether it can truly generate value afterward, not just a paper game. I've seen many projects like this—on-chain + fundraising perfect combo. And then? Still comes down to who can run faster.

View OriginalReply0

SmartContractWorker

· 01-08 19:53

Basically, it's just another fundraising stunt. The RWA approach has become so common that it's everywhere. Tokenizing assets on the chain? Old trick, DeFi already tried that a long time ago. The key is whether it can really make money; there are too many projects that only know how to tell stories.

View OriginalReply0

LayerZeroHero

· 01-08 19:53

It's the same RWA packaging trick again... To put it simply, after assets are on the chain, it's still the same stuff. The real skill is generating cash flow; just raising funds won't get you anywhere.

View OriginalReply0

RamenDeFiSurvivor

· 01-08 19:50

It's the same old story again. Packaging assets on the blockchain as innovation? That DeFi projects have been doing this trick for a long time, and in the end, it's just another way to harvest retail investors.

View OriginalReply0

ChainDoctor

· 01-08 19:46

Basically, it's the same old story, just a different coat of paint. The concept of RWA has been hyped up to death; how many actually make money? Assets are tokenized and packaged to raise funds, but what about afterward? What about cash flow? Looking good on the surface is just the beginning; the key is whether the project team will really roll up their sleeves and get things done. Aren't the lessons from DeFi enough? One failure after another hitting the hands.

View OriginalReply0

SilentAlpha

· 01-08 19:31

It's the same old trick again, just repackage and repackage. --- How long has the RWA concept been hyped up, and they're still using fundraising to save themselves. --- Basically, it's a lack of money. They create on-chain securities to fool people. What about cash flow? --- I was already cut during the DeFi wave, now I’m numb when I see this kind of stuff. --- Asset on the chain = cash flow? Dream on, everyone. --- Raising capital is the goal itself, they never intended to make money from the products. --- Another concept king, how many are actually making real money with real guns?

View OriginalReply0

Ser_Liquidated

· 01-08 19:28

Is it RWA again? I'm already tired of it, brothers, let's try something new. --- Basically, it's just financing innovation; cash flow is the real king. --- DeFi has been used up, NFTs have also gone through a cycle of death, now are we just changing disguises to continue fooling people? --- Concept packaging can catch the eye, but can it generate cash flow? I remain skeptical. --- Asset on-chain isn't new; the key is whether the team is reliable. --- Fundraising, fundraising, still fundraising—never-ending. --- Market acceptance is the most critical; having only technical architecture is useless. --- This model is already very common; why keep repeating it? --- It feels like putting new wine in old bottles; essentially, it's the same old thing. --- On-chain securitization sounds high-end, but how does it actually land?

View OriginalReply0

GamefiEscapeArtist

· 01-08 19:28

It's the same old RWA story, sounding nice but actually just packaging financing. --- To put it plainly, putting assets on the chain ≠ solving problems. These people are still playing the same old DeFi tricks. --- What about cash flow? Financing without cash flow is just hot potato. --- AIXC? Never heard of it, but I'm really tired of this logic. NFT and DeFi have already been deceived this way. --- What is market recognition? When the price crashes, you know how real the recognition is. --- Financing ≠ project. Why do some people always fail to understand such a simple truth?

View OriginalReply0