2026-01-08 22:23:20

Many people have a misconception about decentralized storage — they think that once data is uploaded, it's like running naked, anyone can see it.

Recently, I worked on compliance documentation storage for an RWA project, and I encountered this issue. We ended up using a good privacy solution — encrypt the files directly during upload, then split the encryption keys and store the fragments across different nodes. What are the benefits of this approach? Only when an authorized auditing company's wallet initiates a query will the network reassemble these key fragments to decrypt the original file.

This logic is actually quite clever. It ensures that the file itself cannot be tampered with, while also locking down business secrets from being leaked. Both requirements are met simultaneously, and the compliance concerns of Party A are thus addressed. In practice, it’s even more straightforward than expected.

Disclaimer: This article is for personal technical research and knowledge sharing only and does not constitute investment advice or trading guidance.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

NFTDreamer

· 01-09 00:34

Wow, this idea of splitting and distributed storage of keys is really brilliant. It's much more secure than the decentralized storage I thought of before.

View OriginalReply0

MetaDreamer

· 01-08 22:53

Ha, finally someone said it. This misunderstanding is really annoying and hard to resolve. Dispersed storage of key slices is indeed a brilliant move, much smarter than I thought. Being able to directly handle compliance is really top-notch; the client no longer has to worry about security issues. This logic should have been popularized a long time ago. Why are so many people still afraid of data exposure? Using this solution in RWA scenarios is truly excellent. The practical implementation is smooth and rare.

View OriginalReply0

SighingCashier

· 01-08 22:53

Wow, this idea of distributed storage of key slices is truly brilliant. Finally, someone has explained this concept clearly.

View OriginalReply0

HallucinationGrower

· 01-08 22:52

The idea of distributed storage of key slices is indeed excellent, much more reliable than I had imagined.

View OriginalReply0

NullWhisperer

· 01-08 22:48

ngl the key fragmentation approach is actually clever... but have you stress-tested what happens when nodes go offline? theoretically exploitable if someone maps the network topology.

Reply0

SerumSurfer

· 01-08 22:37

The key slicing dispersion trick is indeed brilliant, much more reliable than I previously thought.

View OriginalReply0

SoliditySlayer

· 01-08 22:31

Oh, the idea of splitting keys into slices and storing them separately is indeed clever. It's much more secure than the decentralized storage I previously understood.

View OriginalReply0

LuckyBearDrawer

· 01-08 22:31

The key slicing distributed storage trick is brilliant. Finally, someone has explained decentralized privacy clearly.

View OriginalReply0