2026-01-08 22:29:41

The current state of Xeet's creator ecosystem is worth paying attention to. The official claim is that 17,000 creators are involved, but the reality may be more complex—estimated active creators number around 5,000. This figure is comparable to the scale of platforms like MezoNetwork and Xyber. The key insight is: quality over quantity. Instead of pursuing inflated creator numbers, it’s better to build a more refined and high-quality creator ecosystem. Observations over the past few months have confirmed this—strategies that rely on sheer numbers have limited effects, while deep engagement from high-quality content creators more effectively drives the project ecosystem’s development. How to optimize incentive mechanisms and enhance creator retention in the future is what Xeet truly needs to address.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

WhaleMinion

· 01-09 17:27

17000 to 5000, that's quite a big difference, feels a bit awkward --- Another story of data inflation, but to be fair, it's really just these people playing with numbers --- Quality beats quantity, finally someone dares to say it directly. It should have been like this from the start --- The incentive mechanism at Xeet needs to be carefully considered, or creative minds will eventually run away --- 5000 active creators compared to MezoNetwork? Hmm, interesting. Still, it depends on the quality of the content --- Stacking numbers is an old trick in Web3 too, and in the end, the users are the ones who suffer --- The sticking power is the real issue. If you can't keep people, everything else is pointless --- Basically, it's just bluffing in the early stages. Now it's time to seriously refine the ecosystem

View OriginalReply0

RumbleValidator

· 01-08 22:59

5000 active vs 17000 promotion, this numerical difference is indeed interesting. I've heard the argument that quality outweighs quantity many times, but how is Xeet's incentive mechanism designed? What is the underlying logic that truly retains high-quality creators, and that is the key.

View OriginalReply0

GasGasGasBro

· 01-08 22:59

Is this more data to cut leeks? 17,000 down to 5,000, uh... that's almost a standard operation in the crypto world. --- 5000 truly active users versus 10,000 zombie followers, this logic makes sense; it all depends on whether Xeet is willing to do it well. --- The incentive mechanism is the core; without it, even creative people will still leave. --- Sounds nice, but in reality, no one really wants to create here. --- Quality > Quantity sounds right, but how many platforms can actually achieve that... probably just a handful.

View OriginalReply0

LightningSentry

· 01-08 22:55

17,000 is too much of a fluff; the truly usable amount is only 5,000? That number is a bit heartbreaking. But on the other hand, I'd rather have 5,000 creators with real gold and silver ideas than 17,000 zombie accounts. Everyone understands this logic, right?

View OriginalReply0

ConsensusBot

· 01-08 22:49

The tactic of water injection with numbers, every ecosystem loves to play it... From 17,000 down to 5,000, essentially it's because the incentives haven't kept up. --- Quality > Quantity is true, but the key is how to retain those 5,000 active users? Can it be done without throwing money in? --- Having 5,000 creators is indeed not many; it seems Xeet's user base isn't as solid as imagined. --- Agreed, vertical specialization and meticulous work are the way to go; just spreading out is not effective. --- The incentive mechanism is the core. Many projects just give out money and call it a day, without considering how to truly make creators feel rewarded. --- So, is Xeet adjusting its strategy now or just blowing smoke? That's what we need to watch. --- As expected, any inflated numbers in an ecosystem can't withstand close scrutiny. Anyway, I only look at active users; everything else is pointless.

View OriginalReply0

SatoshiChallenger

· 01-08 22:32

Ironically, going from 17,000 to 5,000, the shrinkage ratio is just as outrageous as the previous funding round's valuation adjustment [smirk] But to be honest, the argument that quality > quantity has been repeated before every project failure, and now it's Xeet's turn Incentive mechanism optimization? I suggest first asking how many of those 5,000 people are actually active, instead of another sequel of data falsification

View OriginalReply0