REALITY CHECK | The Balancer DEx Exploit Signal DeFi Markets Are Still Experimental

For years, Balancer was considered one of DeFi’s most trusted protocols – a project that had survived multiple bear markets, integrations, and over ten independent audits without scandal.

That reputation unraveled on November 3 2025 when blockchain security firm, PeckShield, revealed that Balancer and several of its forks were under an active exploit spanning multiple chains.

Within hours, more than $128 million was drained from pools across Ethereum, Berachain, Arbitrum, Base, and other networks — freezing protocols and shocking investors.

Multi-Chain Breach

PeckShield reported that Balancer’s Ethereum deployment took the heaviest hit, losing about $100 million, while Berachain lost $12.9 million. Smaller but significant thefts occurred on Arbitrum, Optimism, Polygon, Base, and Sonic.

Balancer confirmed a “potential exploit impacting Balancer v2 pools,” saying its engineering and security teams were investigating with urgency. Still, the disclosure triggered a cascade of withdrawals from integrators and forks.

By day’s end, DeFiLlama data showed Balancer’s total value locked (TVL) had dropped 46%, from $770 million to $422 million.

As of this writing, the Balancer TVL is down to $310 million and dropping.


How the Exploit Worked

Preliminary analysis from blockchain security firm, Phalcon, found that the attacker targeted Balancer Pool Tokens (BPT) – user shares in liquidity pools.

The exploit manipulated the way Balancer calculated pool prices during batch swaps, distorting internal price feeds and allowing the attacker to withdraw tokens before the system could self-correct.

Crypto analyst, Adi, explained:

“Improper authorization and callback handling allowed the attacker to bypass safeguards, enabling unauthorized swaps or balance manipulations across interconnected pools. Assets drained within minutes.”

Balancer’s composable vault architecture, long praised for flexibility, magnified the damage. Because vaults could reference one another dynamically, the manipulated prices spread rapidly through connected pools.

Coinbase’s Conor Grogan observed that the operation bore hallmarks of professional coordination. The attacker’s wallet was funded with 100 ETH from Tornado Cash, likely linked to prior exploits.

“People don’t park 100 ETH in Tornado Cash for fun,” Grogan noted, hinting at an experienced actor.

‘A Trust Collapse’

Beyond the technical loss, the psychological fallout was severe. Balancer was perceived as a conservative, dependable venue for liquidity providers – a protocol where endurance equaled safety.

That illusion collapsed overnight.

Lefteris Karapetsas, founder of Rotki, called it “a trust collapse, not just a hack.”

“A protocol live since 2020, audited and widely used, can still suffer a near-total TVL loss. That’s a red flag for anyone who thinks DeFi is stable.”

The incident underscored a painful truth: even mathematically sound smart contracts can harbor hidden fragility.

Robdog, pseudonymous developer of Cork Protocol, added:

“While DeFi’s foundations are improving, smart contract risk is everywhere.”

Implications for DeFi

The Balancer hack struck at a critical time. October 2025 had seen only $18 million in total DeFi exploits – the lowest monthly loss of 2025, according to PeckShield. But with this single event in early November 2025, the year’s total ballooned by over $120 million, marking one of the worst months on record.

The attack exposed DeFi’s core paradox: the same composability that enables rapid innovation also multiplies systemic risk.

When a protocol as central as Balancer breaks, the damage spreads instantly across the network. On Berachain, validators halted block production to prevent contagion. Other protocols temporarily paused lending and bridging activities to contain fallout.

These emergency responses limited losses but highlighted a fundamental reality — DeFi operates without coordinated crisis mechanisms. There are no central banks, regulators, or safety nets – only developers and auditors racing to mitigate harm in real time.

Robdog reflected:

“This is a reminder of why DeFi needs stronger risk management infrastructure.”

Beyond Code: The Fragility of Trust

While losses can be measured, the erosion of confidence is harder to quantify. Every major exploit chips away at the perception that DeFi’s code is inherently trustworthy. For institutional investors, repeated failures reinforce that decentralized markets remain experimental.

Karapetsas warned:

“No serious capital allocates into systems this fragile.”

Eleven Audits, Still Not Enough

Adding to the shock, Balancer had undergone more than ten audits, including extensive reviews of its core vault contracts by multiple independent firms. Yet, vulnerabilities persisted.

Suhail Kakar, a web3 developer, said this should dispel the myth of “audit infallibility.”

“Audited by X” no longer guarantees safety — it reflects how deeply complex and unpredictable decentralized systems have become.

The Balancer breach is already prompting renewed scrutiny from regulators. In the United States, policymakers are advancing frameworks to govern DeFi protocols, and incidents like this one may accelerate those efforts.

For now, Balancer’s fall serves as a stark reminder: in decentralized finance, resilience is never guaranteed – not even after eleven audits.

Stay tuned to BitKE for updates into the state of DeFi.

Join our WhatsApp channel here.