Decentralized storage is used to host AI model weights, and the cost is indeed much lower than traditional cloud services. This approach is crucial for the future of AI infrastructure. However, my practice is: never skip the step of local hash verification.



The reason is very practical. Although erasure coding can protect data security during network transmission and node reorganization, as a final user, blindly trusting the data to be 100% perfect upon restoration is irrational. Especially in adversarial environments, even a single-bit change in the model file can cause the generated results to go awry.

My process is as follows: after downloading the model from distributed storage, first compute the hash locally and compare it with the original fingerprint uploaded. Only if both match exactly do I load the model into VRAM. Cheap storage costs must be exchanged for more rigorous client-side verification. This is not over-caution; it’s a necessary technical safeguard.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-3824aa38vip
· 23h ago
If even a single Bitcoin can crash, this guy's point makes perfect sense.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerAirdropvip
· 01-08 23:50
He can mess up even a single Bitcoin, this guy's got a point.
View OriginalReply0
AlwaysMissingTopsvip
· 01-08 23:50
To be honest, I like this guy's approach. It's cheap, but a difference of one Bitcoin can ruin the model. Who dares to bet?
View OriginalReply0
EthMaximalistvip
· 01-08 23:46
Hash verification cannot be skipped; a difference of just one bit can ruin the entire inference result.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainBouncervip
· 01-08 23:40
Hash verification cannot be skipped, even a difference of one bit can crash the model. Cost savings are important, but security cannot be compromised. Decentralized storage is cheap, but trust costs still have to be borne by yourself. This is the current state of Web3 infrastructure: cheap and reliable are always on opposite ends of the scale. The local verification process is honestly a bit cumbersome, but compared to a model being tampered with and causing a crash, it's worth it. Even one bit can cause a crash, how cautious does that make us? Error correction codes can't protect all links, so in the end, you still have to keep an eye on things yourself. Is this the price of cheap cloud services? Be your own quality inspector.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)