2026-01-08 23:34:38

Recently, I talked with a few friends who trade around me, and the topics all revolved around the trend of Bitcoin. Yesterday, they were making intraday predictions, and their opinions were surprisingly consistent—bullish up to 92,000 with no big issues. The day before yesterday, someone even mentioned that BTC might surge to 96,000, and it feels like the market in January has indeed been quite good.

To be honest, I didn't fully follow their advice. I made my own judgment and placed a bet at the 90,000 level. As a result, by tonight at 1 a.m. when the settlement happened, Bitcoin steadily stayed above 90,000, almost turning a profit.

Later, I paid attention to one thing—I copied several different trading accounts for comparison and found that these accounts' judgments were actually highly consistent. This is quite interesting. Truly clear-headed judgments often don't produce such uniform voices. Sometimes, seemingly sharp opinions in the market should be questioned. 😂

BTC0,12%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

20 Likes

Reward
20
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

0xTherapist

· 01-09 21:27

The 90,000 wave was indeed interesting. A bunch of accounts all saying the same thing, which actually seems even more suspicious.

View OriginalReply0

MetaLord420

· 01-09 06:04

Why does it feel like this highly consistent group judgment is just copy-pasted? It's too mysterious. By the way, you got pretty lucky with the 90,000 order, but I really don't believe in such uniform opinions. The most illusory thing in the market is consensus. The more people are bullish, the more you should go against the trend.

View OriginalReply0

老王招财的猫

· 01-09 00:19

New Year Wealth Explosion 🤑

View OriginalReply0

ProbablyNothing

· 01-09 00:04

Damn, this is true clarity. When a bunch of accounts are perfectly synchronized, I knew there was definitely something fishy. Someone should have exposed the true faces of these "big V" accounts long ago. They call signals every day, it's hilarious. Did that trade of 90,000 make a profit? Details please.

View OriginalReply0

SelfMadeRuggee

· 01-09 00:02

Haha, that's why I don't really trust the unanimous predictions in the group; they're usually just routines. This guy's idea is pretty good, but the uniformity of the voices itself is quite suspicious. The 90,000 level was a pretty good support; we almost got some gains. I'm more concerned about whether those accounts are operated by the same person; there's a bit of a smell to it. Anyone can call for a buy when the market looks like this, but let's see who still stands up when it really drops.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeCrying

· 01-09 00:00

This is the most genuine truth about trading. When there's consensus, caution is advised.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeCryBaby

· 01-08 23:41

Haha, so consistent, it’s strangely eerie no matter how you look at it. --- That’s why I never follow the crowd; independent thinking is the way to go. --- 90000 is a very precise estimate, almost missed it, but this mindset is worth it. --- Account consistency theories are almost there; the market just keeps chopping the leeks again and again. --- Truthfully, group consensus often calls for the opposite action—lessons from history. --- This wave of insight is pretty good; many people simply can’t see the clues. --- Wait, this logic is a bit strange—why does consistency necessarily mean a routine? --- I’ve heard calls from 92 to 96 so many times that I’ve become more and more cautious. --- Almost making a profit versus fully making a profit—can you explain how it gets stuck? --- Repeated identical numbers are indeed ridiculous; how lazy must one be?

View OriginalReply0