Decentralized storage has always had an industry unwritten rule—if you want to build a storage network, just create your own public chain. Filecoin, Arweave, Chia have all done this.
But Mysten Labs refuses to follow that path.
Recently, while reviewing the Walrus white paper v2.0, what truly impressed me wasn't the storage algorithm itself, but the boldness of its architecture design: Walrus doesn't build its own consensus layer at all; instead, it directly "parasitizes" on the Sui blockchain.
Why is this so clever? Because it does one thing that sounds simple but is difficult to execute—**completely separating control and data**.
You might be familiar with the pitfalls traditional storage public chains have fallen into. Handling both consensus mechanisms and massive data storage makes the network prone to the classic bottleneck effect: either fast transaction processing but slow storage, or smooth storage but sluggish transfers. Wanting both and getting neither.
Walrus's approach is different. Page 6 of the white paper details this model: it treats the Sui blockchain as the "brain," responsible for all consensus, accounting, and verification logic. Meanwhile, storage nodes focus solely on being the "muscle," handling data redundancy and availability.
How efficient is this division of labor? Imagine no longer needing storage nodes to participate in consensus competition—they can dedicate all their resources to reliability. Sui's validator community has already solved the consensus problem, so Walrus can confidently build its storage layer on top of it—enjoying Sui's security without reinventing the wheel.
This is the true form of Web3 infrastructure: professionals doing professional work, achieving maximum efficiency through modular architecture.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
RebaseVictim
· 30m ago
Wow, this architecture design is really awesome. Finally, someone is breaking away from the old套路.
View OriginalReply0
CrashHotline
· 01-09 11:46
Damn, this architecture design is indeed awesome. Not building your own chain is actually smarter.
View OriginalReply0
SatoshiLeftOnRead
· 01-09 11:46
Here are several comments with different styles:
1. Damn, now that's what I call architecture. Other projects are still reinventing the wheel, Walrus's "parasitic" approach is truly brilliant.
2. Finally, someone has separated brains from muscles. Those public chains trying to run marathons and lift weights at the same time—how exhausting can it be?
3. Wait, isn't this just microservices thinking? How did it become an innovation in blockchain... By the way, can Walrus really be stable?
4. The most impressive part is directly cutting down the cost of building consensus, saving money and effort, and riding on Sui's security—awesome.
5. Separating control and data? Sounds simple but is actually exponentially difficult. These folks have thought it through.
6. Seeing Filecoin and those old projects, it must be so frustrating. They spent so much money building chains, only to be crushed by this move.
7. This is what Web3 should learn. Don't do everything yourself—it's really just modern LEGO.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseVagabond
· 01-09 11:45
Wow, finally a project that doesn't follow the old path. This idea is brilliant.
View OriginalReply0
ZkSnarker
· 01-09 11:34
ngl this actually makes sense... why reinvent consensus when sui already solved it. walrus just said "we're doing storage, that's it" and honestly? based.
Decentralized storage has always had an industry unwritten rule—if you want to build a storage network, just create your own public chain. Filecoin, Arweave, Chia have all done this.
But Mysten Labs refuses to follow that path.
Recently, while reviewing the Walrus white paper v2.0, what truly impressed me wasn't the storage algorithm itself, but the boldness of its architecture design: Walrus doesn't build its own consensus layer at all; instead, it directly "parasitizes" on the Sui blockchain.
Why is this so clever? Because it does one thing that sounds simple but is difficult to execute—**completely separating control and data**.
You might be familiar with the pitfalls traditional storage public chains have fallen into. Handling both consensus mechanisms and massive data storage makes the network prone to the classic bottleneck effect: either fast transaction processing but slow storage, or smooth storage but sluggish transfers. Wanting both and getting neither.
Walrus's approach is different. Page 6 of the white paper details this model: it treats the Sui blockchain as the "brain," responsible for all consensus, accounting, and verification logic. Meanwhile, storage nodes focus solely on being the "muscle," handling data redundancy and availability.
How efficient is this division of labor? Imagine no longer needing storage nodes to participate in consensus competition—they can dedicate all their resources to reliability. Sui's validator community has already solved the consensus problem, so Walrus can confidently build its storage layer on top of it—enjoying Sui's security without reinventing the wheel.
This is the true form of Web3 infrastructure: professionals doing professional work, achieving maximum efficiency through modular architecture.