In lending, the market presents two immutable rules. The tighter the funds, the harder it is to generate returns; the larger the protocol's size, the lower the costs—seems contradictory, but actually not.



A leading DeFi protocol has taken these two rules to new heights. Its TVL once surged to $4.3 billion, ranking first in the BNB Chain lending sector, forcibly driving down borrowing rates to 1%. What does this mean? It indicates that interest rate arbitrage has shifted from speculation to a form of guaranteed income.

How is this achieved? Let's break it down into three levels.

On the technical side, the foundation is solid—over-collateralization combined with a grid management system of liquidation bots keeps the bad debt rate at 0.12%, a figure far below Aave's 0.9%. Risk control isn't empty talk; it's backed by real data.

On the funding side, the protocol leverages ecosystem advantages. Blue-chip assets like BNB, slisBNB, BTCB continuously flow in. Even with a utilization rate of 85%, the protocol can still maintain low interest rates—this is the power of scale. Small protocols don't even stand a chance.

Incentive strategies are also carefully designed—token rewards are fully directed toward depositors, while borrowers receive almost no subsidies. Although this approach may seem unfriendly, it actually ensures the authenticity of interest rates, preventing them from becoming bubbles driven by mining debt.

Looking at the other end, Binance USD1 Earn can yield 20% annualized, a stablecoin pool on a certain DEX maintains around 8%, and Solv's USD1 product offers about 10%. All these yields surpass the 1% to 2% borrowing costs. The interest rate spread is there, not for short-term speculation, but as a long-term structural opportunity.

In simple terms, the $4.3 billion TVL is a moat, and the 1% interest rate is the pass to enter that moat. The 20% arbitrage space won't disappear out of thin air; the earlier you participate, the lower your costs.
BNB1,31%
AAVE0,59%
USD10,02%
SOLV-1,91%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
SadMoneyMeowvip
· 7h ago
1% borrowing rate? Is this implying I should buy the dip? My wallet is already starving. 2. A 0.12% bad debt rate is a slap to Aave, but I’m still hesitant. Let’s wait and see. 3. The 20% arbitrage margin hasn’t disappeared? Feels like I’ve heard that line many times before... 4. Real interest rates vs. mining bubble, finally someone dares to do this. Now that’s honesty. 5. Maintaining low interest with 85% capital utilization—scale is the key. 6. Yet another argument about the moat of scale. How can small tokens turn things around? 7. Incentives are only focused on depositors; borrowers aren’t subsidized... That’s a bit harsh. 8. How long can the BNB ecosystem’s golden period last? 9. The interest spread from 1% to 20%—to be honest, that’s quite tempting. 10. 4.3 billion TVL sounds impressive, but can this number be sustained?
View OriginalReply0
MEVictimvip
· 11h ago
1% borrowing interest rate? Really? Could this be another high-yield trap? 2% cost for 20% returns, sounds like a scam. 0.12% bad debt rate is indeed low, but could I be next? Large scale allows for reckless behavior; small investors are always the leeks. The people who bought in the morning made a killing. Is there still a chance now? With such a big interest spread, why haven't big players leveled this out? The arbitrage space seems so obvious; it should have been wiped out long ago. Managing liquidation bots sounds good, but I'm a bit afraid of being liquidated.
View OriginalReply0
SatoshiChallengervip
· 11h ago
0.12% bad debt rate? Ironically, the previous protocol that touted "risk control" was liquidated with a rate soaring to 87% after just two months. Wait, can a 20% guaranteed arbitrage opportunity really exist long-term? This logic feels somewhat familiar to me. The data looks good, but what happens to the collateral when the token price drops? Larger scale actually concentrates risk more. Is a 1% interest rate a guaranteed return? I suggest looking at the "guaranteed" returns before Luna's collapse. Interesting, it's another "moat" story. The last time I heard this phrase was in the roadmap of a certain protocol back in March.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerWalletvip
· 11h ago
0.12% bad debt rate is really impressive, but can this interest spread arbitrage truly last for 20 years? I always feel like it could be shattered any day.
View OriginalReply0
MoneyBurnervip
· 11h ago
0.12% bad debt rate? This data is really rubbing Aave into the ground, no wonder the interest rates can be so low.
View OriginalReply0
zkNoobvip
· 12h ago
TVL of 4.3 billion drops to a 1% interest rate; this moat is indeed quite fierce. I just want to ask, how long can it last?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)