Vanguard, when it started gaining access to crypto funds traded on the exchange last month, issued a statement revealing the company’s true thoughts behind this decision. John Ameriks, Vanguard’s Global Quantitative Equity Head, likened bitcoin (BTC currently $78.43K) to a “digital Labubu,” viewing it as a high-risk investment vehicle and suggesting that, rather than a long-term wealth-building asset, it is more of a toy-like speculative collectible.
John Ameriks’ Labubu Analogy and the Speculative Nature of Bitcoin
Ameriks’ remarks were made during Bloomberg’s ETFs in Depth conference in New York. The executive emphasized that bitcoin lacks the income, compound returns, and cash flow characteristics that Vanguard seeks when evaluating long-term investments. This comparison to the popular collectible toy Labubu reflects the nature of products that are appealing as toys but lack real investment value.
Describing bitcoin in this way underscores Vanguard’s longstanding skepticism and caution toward the crypto sector. Ameriks explicitly stated that this perspective has not changed, reiterating that digital assets are still viewed as highly speculative and do not align with the company’s fundamental investment philosophy.
The company’s position presents an interesting paradox. After seeing its platform tested during market volatility and observing that its ETFs and funds perform as designed while maintaining liquidity, Vanguard decided to open its platform to these products. It provides access to regulated investment vehicles comparable to those of competitors like BlackRock and Fidelity for its 50 million clients.
However, Ameriks clarified that despite providing access, Vanguard will not advise clients to buy or sell crypto assets or specify which tokens to hold. The company has no plans to launch its own crypto-focused ETFs. This approach reflects a balancing act between the company’s decision to treat exchange-traded products as toy-like and its core investment philosophy.
BlackRock’s Success with Crypto ETFs and Vanguard’s Cautious Strategy
Vanguard’s cautious stance contrasts sharply with the much more aggressive approach of other players in the sector. For BlackRock, bitcoin ETFs have become the most lucrative revenue source. Fidelity similarly pursues an active marketing strategy for crypto products.
While Ameriks acknowledged that bitcoin could eventually show non-speculative value under certain conditions such as high inflation or political instability, he argued that the evidence remains limited. Referring to the short track record, he stated that digital assets have not yet demonstrated a sufficiently long performance history.
Vanguard’s position raises an ongoing question in the world of institutional investing: Are crypto assets suitable for long-term investments, or will they remain toy-like speculative instruments?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Vanguard's Cryptocurrency Platform Reminded People of Bitcoin with Toy Appeal
Vanguard, when it started gaining access to crypto funds traded on the exchange last month, issued a statement revealing the company’s true thoughts behind this decision. John Ameriks, Vanguard’s Global Quantitative Equity Head, likened bitcoin (BTC currently $78.43K) to a “digital Labubu,” viewing it as a high-risk investment vehicle and suggesting that, rather than a long-term wealth-building asset, it is more of a toy-like speculative collectible.
John Ameriks’ Labubu Analogy and the Speculative Nature of Bitcoin
Ameriks’ remarks were made during Bloomberg’s ETFs in Depth conference in New York. The executive emphasized that bitcoin lacks the income, compound returns, and cash flow characteristics that Vanguard seeks when evaluating long-term investments. This comparison to the popular collectible toy Labubu reflects the nature of products that are appealing as toys but lack real investment value.
Describing bitcoin in this way underscores Vanguard’s longstanding skepticism and caution toward the crypto sector. Ameriks explicitly stated that this perspective has not changed, reiterating that digital assets are still viewed as highly speculative and do not align with the company’s fundamental investment philosophy.
Vanguard’s Inconsistent Stance: Platform Launch Amid Ongoing Skepticism
The company’s position presents an interesting paradox. After seeing its platform tested during market volatility and observing that its ETFs and funds perform as designed while maintaining liquidity, Vanguard decided to open its platform to these products. It provides access to regulated investment vehicles comparable to those of competitors like BlackRock and Fidelity for its 50 million clients.
However, Ameriks clarified that despite providing access, Vanguard will not advise clients to buy or sell crypto assets or specify which tokens to hold. The company has no plans to launch its own crypto-focused ETFs. This approach reflects a balancing act between the company’s decision to treat exchange-traded products as toy-like and its core investment philosophy.
BlackRock’s Success with Crypto ETFs and Vanguard’s Cautious Strategy
Vanguard’s cautious stance contrasts sharply with the much more aggressive approach of other players in the sector. For BlackRock, bitcoin ETFs have become the most lucrative revenue source. Fidelity similarly pursues an active marketing strategy for crypto products.
While Ameriks acknowledged that bitcoin could eventually show non-speculative value under certain conditions such as high inflation or political instability, he argued that the evidence remains limited. Referring to the short track record, he stated that digital assets have not yet demonstrated a sufficiently long performance history.
Vanguard’s position raises an ongoing question in the world of institutional investing: Are crypto assets suitable for long-term investments, or will they remain toy-like speculative instruments?