1INCH vs MANA: Comparing Two Major Players in the Decentralized Finance Ecosystem

Introduction: Investment Comparison between 1INCH and MANA

In the cryptocurrency market, the comparison between 1INCH vs MANA has always been an unavoidable topic for investors. The two not only show significant differences in market cap ranking, application scenarios, and price performance, but also represent different positions in crypto assets.

1INCH (1INCH): Since its launch in 2020, it has gained market recognition for its decentralized exchange aggregator functionality.

Decentraland (MANA): Introduced in 2017, it has been hailed as a pioneer in blockchain-based virtual worlds, representing one of the early projects in the metaverse space.

This article will comprehensively analyze the investment value comparison between 1INCH vs MANA, focusing on historical price trends, supply mechanisms, institutional adoption, technological ecosystems, and future predictions, attempting to answer the question investors care about most:

"Which is the better buy right now?"

I. Price History Comparison and Current Market Status

1INCH and MANA Historical Price Trends

• 2021: 1INCH reached its all-time high of $8.65 on October 27, 2021.
• 2021: MANA hit its record high of $5.85 on November 25, 2021, likely influenced by the metaverse hype.
• Comparative analysis: Both tokens have experienced significant declines from their all-time highs. 1INCH has fallen from $8.65 to a current price of $0.171, while MANA has dropped from $5.85 to $0.2267.

Current Market Situation (2025-10-18)

• 1INCH current price: $0.171
• MANA current price: $0.2267
• 24-hour trading volume: $673,870.94 (1INCH) vs $888,788.13 (MANA)
• Market Sentiment Index (Fear & Greed Index): 22 (Extreme Fear)

Click to view real-time prices:

• Check 1INCH current price Market Price
• Check MANA current price Market Price

II. Core Factors Affecting Investment Value of 1INCH vs MANA

Supply Mechanism Comparison (Tokenomics)

• 1INCH: Total supply capped at 1.5 billion tokens with 63% currently in circulation. Features governance-controlled emissions and token burns.
• MANA: Fixed total supply of 2.8 billion tokens with 81% already in circulation. Burns MANA spent on LAND purchases within Decentraland.
• 📌 Historical Pattern: Deflationary mechanisms in MANA have historically provided price support during adoption phases, while 1INCH's controlled emissions allow for sustainable ecosystem incentives.

Institutional Adoption and Market Applications

• Institutional Holdings: MANA has attracted more institutional interest through metaverse-focused funds and real estate development in Decentraland.
• Enterprise Adoption: 1INCH focuses on institutional DEX trading solutions, while MANA serves as the foundation for virtual real estate and commerce in the metaverse.
• Regulatory Attitudes: Both tokens face similar regulatory scrutiny as utility tokens, though MANA's metaverse applications may face fewer regulatory hurdles than DeFi protocols.

Technical Development and Ecosystem Building

• 1INCH Technical Upgrades: Recent implementation of fusion mode for gas-free swaps and continued development of its Aggregation Protocol and Limit Order Protocol.
• MANA Technical Development: Focus on Decentraland platform improvements, including enhanced virtual world rendering, improved avatar systems, and better developer tools.
• Ecosystem Comparison: 1INCH dominates in DeFi with DEX aggregation services, while MANA has established leadership in virtual real estate, NFTs, and metaverse experiences.

Macroeconomic Factors and Market Cycles

• Performance During Inflation: MANA has shown stronger performance during inflationary periods due to its association with digital assets and virtual real estate.
• Macroeconomic Monetary Policy: Both tokens demonstrate high correlation with tech stocks and risk assets, with negative sensitivity to interest rate hikes.
• Geopolitical Factors: MANA benefits from increasing interest in digital spaces during geopolitical uncertainty, while 1INCH benefits from demand for decentralized trading options.

III. 2025-2030 Price Prediction: 1INCH vs MANA

Short-term Prediction (2025)

• 1INCH: Conservative $0.10278 - $0.1713 | Optimistic $0.196995
• MANA: Conservative $0.21622 - $0.2276 | Optimistic $0.277672

Mid-term Prediction (2027)

• 1INCH may enter a growth phase, with prices expected in the range of $0.17153339625 - $0.2244758025
• MANA may enter a consolidation phase, with prices expected in the range of $0.132065469 - $0.318510837
• Key drivers: Institutional capital inflow, ETFs, ecosystem development

Long-term Prediction (2030)

• 1INCH: Base scenario $0.164175513571781 - $0.298500933766875 | Optimistic scenario $0.3343210458189
• MANA: Base scenario $0.192073056998623 - $0.331160443101075 | Optimistic scenario $0.423885367169376

View detailed price predictions for 1INCH and MANA

Disclaimer: The above predictions are based on historical data and market analysis. Cryptocurrency markets are highly volatile and subject to change. This information should not be considered as financial advice. Always conduct your own research before making investment decisions.

1INCH:

MANA:

IV. Investment Strategy Comparison: 1INCH vs MANA

Long-term vs Short-term Investment Strategies

• 1INCH: Suitable for investors focused on DeFi ecosystems and DEX aggregation potential
• MANA: Suitable for investors interested in metaverse development and digital real estate

Risk Management and Asset Allocation

• Conservative investors: 1INCH: 30% vs MANA: 70%
• Aggressive investors: 1INCH: 60% vs MANA: 40%
• Hedging tools: Stablecoin allocation, options, cross-currency portfolios

V. Potential Risk Comparison

Market Risks

• 1INCH: High volatility due to DeFi market fluctuations
• MANA: Susceptible to metaverse hype cycles and virtual real estate market trends

Technical Risks

• 1INCH: Scalability, network stability
• MANA: Platform performance, virtual world rendering issues

Regulatory Risks

• Global regulatory policies may impact 1INCH more due to its focus on DeFi, while MANA may face less scrutiny in the metaverse space

VI. Conclusion: Which Is the Better Buy?

📌 Investment Value Summary:

• 1INCH advantages: Strong position in DeFi, DEX aggregation leadership, continuous technical upgrades
• MANA advantages: Established metaverse presence, digital real estate pioneer, institutional interest in virtual worlds

✅ Investment Advice:

• New investors: Consider a balanced approach with a slight tilt towards MANA due to its more established market presence
• Experienced investors: Explore a higher allocation to 1INCH for potential DeFi growth, while maintaining MANA exposure
• Institutional investors: Consider both tokens for diversified exposure to DeFi and metaverse sectors

⚠️ Risk Warning: The cryptocurrency market is highly volatile, and this article does not constitute investment advice. None

VII. FAQ

Q1: What are the key differences between 1INCH and MANA? A: 1INCH is a decentralized exchange aggregator focused on DeFi, while MANA is the native token of Decentraland, a blockchain-based virtual world. 1INCH targets DeFi traders and liquidity providers, whereas MANA caters to users interested in virtual real estate and metaverse experiences.

Q2: Which token has shown better price performance historically? A: Both tokens reached their all-time highs in late 2021, with 1INCH peaking at $8.65 and MANA at $5.85. Since then, both have experienced significant declines, with 1INCH currently at $0.171 and MANA at $0.2267. MANA has retained slightly more value relative to its all-time high.

Q3: How do the supply mechanisms of 1INCH and MANA differ? A: 1INCH has a capped total supply of 1.5 billion tokens with 63% in circulation, featuring governance-controlled emissions and token burns. MANA has a fixed total supply of 2.8 billion tokens with 81% in circulation and burns MANA spent on LAND purchases within Decentraland.

Q4: Which token has attracted more institutional interest? A: MANA has generally attracted more institutional interest, particularly through metaverse-focused funds and real estate development in Decentraland. 1INCH, however, focuses more on institutional DEX trading solutions.

Q5: What are the main technical developments for each token? A: 1INCH has recently implemented fusion mode for gas-free swaps and continues developing its Aggregation Protocol and Limit Order Protocol. MANA focuses on Decentraland platform improvements, including enhanced virtual world rendering, improved avatar systems, and better developer tools.

Q6: How do macroeconomic factors affect 1INCH and MANA differently? A: MANA has shown stronger performance during inflationary periods due to its association with digital assets and virtual real estate. Both tokens demonstrate high correlation with tech stocks and risk assets, with negative sensitivity to interest rate hikes.

Q7: What are the long-term price predictions for 1INCH and MANA? A: By 2030, 1INCH is predicted to range from $0.164 to $0.334, while MANA is expected to range from $0.192 to $0.424 in base scenarios. However, these predictions are subject to market volatility and should not be considered financial advice.

Q8: Which token is considered a better buy for different types of investors? A: New investors might consider a balanced approach with a slight tilt towards MANA due to its more established market presence. Experienced investors could explore a higher allocation to 1INCH for potential DeFi growth while maintaining MANA exposure. Institutional investors might consider both tokens for diversified exposure to DeFi and metaverse sectors.