Introduction: DEEP vs OP Investment Comparison
In the cryptocurrency market, the comparison between DeepBook (DEEP) and Optimism (OP) has been an unavoidable topic for investors. The two not only show significant differences in market cap ranking, application scenarios, and price performance, but also represent different crypto asset positioning.
DeepBook (DEEP): Since its launch in 2024, it has gained market recognition for its position as a next-generation decentralized central limit order book (CLOB) built on Sui.
Optimism (OP): Introduced in 2022, it has been hailed as a low-cost, lightning-fast Ethereum Layer 2 blockchain, becoming one of the cryptocurrencies with significant global trading volume and market capitalization.
This article will comprehensively analyze the investment value comparison between DEEP and OP, focusing on historical price trends, supply mechanisms, institutional adoption, technological ecosystems, and future predictions, attempting to answer the question investors care about most:
"Which is the better buy right now?"
I. Price History Comparison and Current Market Status
DEEP and OP Historical Price Trends
- 2025: DEEP reached its all-time high of $0.34572 on January 18, 2025.
- 2024: OP hit its all-time high of $4.84 on March 6, 2024.
- Comparative analysis: In the recent market cycle, DEEP dropped from its high of $0.34572 to a low of $0.005263, while OP declined from $4.84 to $0.34081.
Current Market Situation (2025-10-18)
- DEEP current price: $0.08103
- OP current price: $0.4205
- 24-hour trading volume: DEEP $3,047,406.65 vs OP $2,455,179.97
- Market Sentiment Index (Fear & Greed Index): 23 (Extreme Fear)
Click to view real-time prices:

II. Core Factors Affecting DEEP vs OP Investment Value
Supply Mechanism Comparison (Tokenomics)
- OP: Operates with an initial supply of 4.29 billion tokens allocated among core contributors, investors, ecosystem funds, and the Optimism Foundation.
- DEEP: Limited information available about specific supply mechanisms.
- 📌 Historical Pattern: Supply mechanisms with clear allocation and distribution strategies like OP's tend to provide more transparency for investors to make informed decisions.
Institutional Adoption and Market Applications
- Institutional Holdings: OP appears to have stronger institutional backing with Optimism's established reputation in the Layer 2 scaling space.
- Enterprise Adoption: OP has gained traction through Optimism's partnerships with various DeFi protocols and applications like Uniswap, Synthetix, and Aave.
- Regulatory Attitudes: Limited information available about specific regulatory positions on either token.
Technical Development and Ecosystem Building
- OP Technical Upgrades: The Bedrock upgrade improves compatibility with Ethereum, enhances modularity, and increases security with separate execution and settlement layers.
- DEEP Technical Development: Implements a unique dual-token economy system with the DEEP token functioning as the governance token.
- Ecosystem Comparison: OP has a more established ecosystem with numerous DeFi applications and protocols already deployed on Optimism, while DEEP is building its ecosystem through the DeepNFT marketplace and other DeFi functionalities.
Macroeconomic Factors and Market Cycles
- Performance in Inflationary Environments: Limited historical data available for comparison.
- Macro Monetary Policy Effects: Both tokens, as part of the broader crypto market, would likely be affected by changes in interest rates and dollar strength.
- Geopolitical Factors: Limited information available about specific geopolitical impacts on either token.
III. 2025-2030 Price Prediction: DEEP vs OP
Short-term Prediction (2025)
- DEEP: Conservative $0.0502882 - $0.08111 | Optimistic $0.08111 - $0.1078763
- OP: Conservative $0.269184 - $0.4206 | Optimistic $0.4206 - $0.513132
Mid-term Prediction (2027)
- DEEP may enter a growth phase, with expected price range $0.07347787344 - $0.12399391143
- OP may enter a bullish market, with expected price range $0.45752868 - $0.846428058
- Key drivers: Institutional investment, ETF launches, ecosystem development
Long-term Prediction (2030)
- DEEP: Base scenario $0.157162282737525 - $0.18859473928503 | Optimistic scenario $0.18859473928503+
- OP: Base scenario $0.8670660329331 - $1.109844522154368 | Optimistic scenario $1.109844522154368+
View detailed price predictions for DEEP and OP
Disclaimer: These predictions are based on historical data and market analysis. Cryptocurrency markets are highly volatile and subject to change. This information should not be considered as financial advice.
DEEP:
年份 |
预测最高价 |
预测平均价格 |
预测最低价 |
涨跌幅 |
2025 |
0.1078763 |
0.08111 |
0.0502882 |
0 |
2026 |
0.1351252045 |
0.09449315 |
0.0859887665 |
16 |
2027 |
0.12399391143 |
0.11480917725 |
0.07347787344 |
41 |
2028 |
0.1599980694156 |
0.11940154434 |
0.0979092663588 |
47 |
2029 |
0.17462475859725 |
0.1396998068778 |
0.099186862883238 |
72 |
2030 |
0.18859473928503 |
0.157162282737525 |
0.106870352261517 |
93 |
OP:
年份 |
预测最高价 |
预测平均价格 |
预测最低价 |
涨跌幅 |
2025 |
0.513132 |
0.4206 |
0.269184 |
0 |
2026 |
0.6769557 |
0.466866 |
0.39216744 |
11 |
2027 |
0.846428058 |
0.57191085 |
0.45752868 |
36 |
2028 |
0.95028706836 |
0.709169454 |
0.36167642154 |
68 |
2029 |
0.9044038046862 |
0.82972826118 |
0.6886744567794 |
97 |
2030 |
1.109844522154368 |
0.8670660329331 |
0.763018108981128 |
106 |
IV. Investment Strategy Comparison: DEEP vs OP
Long-term vs Short-term Investment Strategy
- DEEP: Suitable for investors focused on decentralized exchange ecosystems and CLOB potential
- OP: Suitable for investors seeking Layer 2 scaling solutions and established DeFi ecosystem exposure
Risk Management and Asset Allocation
- Conservative investors: DEEP: 20% vs OP: 80%
- Aggressive investors: DEEP: 40% vs OP: 60%
- Hedging tools: Stablecoin allocation, options, cross-token portfolio
V. Potential Risk Comparison
Market Risk
- DEEP: Higher volatility due to lower market cap and trading volume
- OP: Susceptible to broader Ethereum ecosystem fluctuations
Technical Risk
- DEEP: Scalability, network stability
- OP: Dependency on Ethereum, potential vulnerabilities in Layer 2 technology
Regulatory Risk
- Global regulatory policies may have differing impacts on both tokens, with OP potentially facing more scrutiny due to its larger market presence
VI. Conclusion: Which Is the Better Buy?
📌 Investment Value Summary:
- DEEP advantages: Innovative CLOB technology, potential for rapid growth in a niche market
- OP advantages: Established ecosystem, strong institutional backing, proven Layer 2 scaling solution
✅ Investment Advice:
- New investors: Consider a smaller allocation to OP for exposure to Layer 2 solutions
- Experienced investors: Balanced approach with a tilt towards OP, but consider DEEP for diversification
- Institutional investors: Focus on OP for its established ecosystem and institutional adoption, monitor DEEP for potential future opportunities
⚠️ Risk Warning: The cryptocurrency market is highly volatile, and this article does not constitute investment advice.
None
VII. FAQ
Q1: What are the key differences between DEEP and OP?
A: DEEP is a next-generation decentralized central limit order book (CLOB) built on Sui, while OP is a low-cost, fast Ethereum Layer 2 blockchain. OP has a larger market cap, more established ecosystem, and stronger institutional backing, while DEEP offers innovative CLOB technology with potential for rapid growth in a niche market.
Q2: Which token has shown better price performance historically?
A: OP has shown better historical price performance, reaching an all-time high of $4.84 in March 2024, compared to DEEP's all-time high of $0.34572 in January 2025. However, both tokens have experienced significant drops from their peak prices.
Q3: How do the supply mechanisms of DEEP and OP compare?
A: OP has a clear supply mechanism with an initial supply of 4.29 billion tokens allocated among various stakeholders. Limited information is available about DEEP's specific supply mechanisms, making OP more transparent for investors in this aspect.
Q4: What are the main risk factors for investing in DEEP and OP?
A: For DEEP, main risks include higher volatility due to lower market cap, and potential technical risks related to scalability and network stability. For OP, risks include susceptibility to Ethereum ecosystem fluctuations and potential vulnerabilities in Layer 2 technology. Both face regulatory risks, with OP potentially facing more scrutiny due to its larger market presence.
Q5: Which token is recommended for new investors?
A: For new investors, a smaller allocation to OP is generally recommended due to its more established ecosystem and stronger institutional backing. However, investment decisions should be based on individual risk tolerance and thorough research.
Q6: How do the long-term price predictions for DEEP and OP compare?
A: By 2030, the base scenario predicts DEEP to reach $0.157162282737525 - $0.18859473928503, while OP is expected to reach $0.8670660329331 - $1.109844522154368. These predictions suggest potentially higher growth for OP, but both tokens show positive long-term outlooks.
Q7: What factors could influence the future growth of DEEP and OP?
A: Key factors include institutional investment, potential ETF launches, ecosystem development, technological advancements, regulatory changes, and overall market conditions. OP's growth may be more tied to Ethereum's success and Layer 2 adoption, while DEEP's growth could depend on the adoption of its CLOB technology and the expansion of the Sui ecosystem.