Introduction: FIL vs NEAR Investment Comparison
In the cryptocurrency market, the comparison between Filecoin (FIL) and NEAR Protocol (NEAR) has been an unavoidable topic for investors. The two not only show significant differences in market cap ranking, application scenarios, and price performance but also represent different positioning in the crypto asset space.
Filecoin (FIL): Since its launch in 2020, it has gained market recognition for its decentralized storage network capabilities.
NEAR Protocol (NEAR): Introduced in 2020, it has been hailed as a highly scalable foundation protocol for supporting DApp operations on mobile devices.
This article will comprehensively analyze the investment value comparison between FIL and NEAR, focusing on historical price trends, supply mechanisms, institutional adoption, technological ecosystems, and future predictions, attempting to answer the question most concerning to investors:
"Which is the better buy right now?"
Here is the analysis in English as requested:
I. Price History Comparison and Current Market Status
Historical Price Trends of FIL (Coin A) and NEAR (Coin B)
- 2021: FIL reached its all-time high of $236.84 due to growing interest in decentralized storage solutions.
- 2022: NEAR hit its peak price of $20.44 in January, driven by increased adoption of its blockchain platform.
- Comparative analysis: During the 2022-2023 bear market, FIL dropped from its high of $236.84 to a low of $0.848008, while NEAR declined from $20.44 to $1.8023.
Current Market Situation (2025-10-16)
- FIL current price: $1.603
- NEAR current price: $2.323
- 24-hour trading volume: FIL $2,593,394.61 vs NEAR $3,407,598.89
- Market Sentiment Index (Fear & Greed Index): 34 (Fear)
Click to view real-time prices:

II. Core Factors Affecting FIL's Investment Value
Supply Mechanism (Tokenomics)
- FIL: Protocol Labs received 15% of the total supply, including 4.5% allocated to the PL team and contributors
- 📌 Historical Pattern: FIL tokens serve as collateral, creating economic incentives for reliable long-term data storage and ensuring blockchain security, including subnetworks or shards after the implementation of Interplanetary Consensus (IPC)
Institutional Adoption & Market Applications
- Institutional Holdings: Increasing institutional participation is a core driving factor for FIL's market value
- Enterprise Adoption: Growing real-world use cases as Web3.0 and AI data storage demand expands
- Regulatory Stance: Various regulatory environments affect FIL's adoption across different markets
Technical Development & Ecosystem Building
- FIL Technical Upgrades: Implementation of Interplanetary Consensus (IPC) by Consensus Lab enhances network capabilities
- Ecosystem Comparison: Expanding decentralized storage network transforming cloud storage into an algorithmic marketplace
- Integration Depth: FIL's technical depth and ecosystem integration are opening new strategic opportunities for core investors
Macroeconomic & Market Cycles
- Performance During Inflation: Current price, fundamentals, industry outlook, and technical innovations position FIL for potential value reassessment
- Monetary Policy Impact: High interest rate environments reduce market liquidity, with investors favoring cash or risk-free assets over speculative crypto assets
- Market Volatility: Despite short-term market fluctuations, FIL's long-term value remains noteworthy as decentralized storage demand increases
III. 2025-2030 Price Prediction: FIL vs NEAR
Short-term Prediction (2025)
- FIL: Conservative $1.09 - $1.60 | Optimistic $1.60 - $2.39
- NEAR: Conservative $2.23 - $2.33 | Optimistic $2.33 - $3.10
Mid-term Prediction (2027)
- FIL may enter a growth phase, with expected price range $1.82 - $3.50
- NEAR may enter a volatile phase, with expected price range $1.92 - $4.42
- Key drivers: Institutional capital inflow, ETF, ecosystem development
Long-term Prediction (2030)
- FIL: Base scenario $2.18 - $3.90 | Optimistic scenario $3.90 - $5.14
- NEAR: Base scenario $3.79 - $4.63 | Optimistic scenario $4.63 - $5.55
View detailed price predictions for FIL and NEAR
Disclaimer
FIL:
年份 |
预测最高价 |
预测平均价格 |
预测最低价 |
涨跌幅 |
2025 |
2.38847 |
1.603 |
1.09004 |
0 |
2026 |
2.73415695 |
1.995735 |
1.49680125 |
24 |
2027 |
3.500120043 |
2.364945975 |
1.82100840075 |
47 |
2028 |
3.43106362053 |
2.932533009 |
1.64221848504 |
83 |
2029 |
4.61360755640925 |
3.181798314765 |
2.4181667192214 |
98 |
2030 |
5.144967874975005 |
3.897702935587125 |
2.18271364392879 |
143 |
NEAR:
年份 |
预测最高价 |
预测平均价格 |
预测最低价 |
涨跌幅 |
2025 |
3.09624 |
2.328 |
2.23488 |
0 |
2026 |
3.6884832 |
2.71212 |
2.6307564 |
16 |
2027 |
4.416416208 |
3.2003016 |
1.92018096 |
37 |
2028 |
4.72236504096 |
3.808358904 |
3.57985736976 |
63 |
2029 |
4.9904735078016 |
4.26536197248 |
3.2416750990848 |
83 |
2030 |
5.55350128816896 |
4.6279177401408 |
3.794892546915456 |
99 |
IV. Investment Strategy Comparison: FIL vs NEAR
Long-term vs Short-term Investment Strategies
- FIL: Suitable for investors focused on decentralized storage solutions and Web3 infrastructure
- NEAR: Suitable for investors interested in scalable blockchain platforms and DApp development
Risk Management and Asset Allocation
- Conservative investors: FIL: 40% vs NEAR: 60%
- Aggressive investors: FIL: 60% vs NEAR: 40%
- Hedging tools: Stablecoin allocation, options, cross-currency portfolios
V. Potential Risk Comparison
Market Risk
- FIL: Volatility due to evolving decentralized storage market
- NEAR: Competition from other Layer 1 blockchain platforms
Technical Risk
- FIL: Scalability, network stability
- NEAR: Validator concentration, security vulnerabilities
Regulatory Risk
- Global regulatory policies may have different impacts on both assets
VI. Conclusion: Which Is the Better Buy?
📌 Investment Value Summary:
- FIL advantages: Unique decentralized storage proposition, growing enterprise adoption
- NEAR advantages: High scalability, user-friendly developer experience
✅ Investment Advice:
- New investors: Consider a balanced approach with exposure to both assets
- Experienced investors: Allocate based on risk tolerance and belief in respective technologies
- Institutional investors: Evaluate long-term potential of decentralized storage vs. scalable blockchain platforms
⚠️ Risk Warning: The cryptocurrency market is highly volatile. This article does not constitute investment advice.
None
VII. FAQ
Q1: What are the main differences between FIL and NEAR?
A: FIL focuses on decentralized storage solutions, while NEAR is a scalable blockchain platform for DApp development. FIL aims to revolutionize cloud storage, whereas NEAR targets high-performance and user-friendly blockchain applications.
Q2: Which cryptocurrency has shown better price performance historically?
A: FIL reached a higher all-time high of $236.84 in 2021, compared to NEAR's peak of $20.44 in 2022. However, both experienced significant drops during the 2022-2023 bear market.
Q3: How do the current market prices of FIL and NEAR compare?
A: As of 2025-10-16, FIL is priced at $1.603, while NEAR is trading at $2.323. NEAR currently has a higher trading volume of $3,407,598.89 compared to FIL's $2,593,394.61 in the last 24 hours.
Q4: What are the key factors affecting FIL's investment value?
A: Key factors include its supply mechanism (tokenomics), institutional adoption, technical development (such as Interplanetary Consensus), ecosystem building, and macroeconomic conditions.
Q5: How do the long-term price predictions for FIL and NEAR compare?
A: For 2030, FIL's base scenario predicts a range of $2.18 - $3.90, with an optimistic scenario of $3.90 - $5.14. NEAR's base scenario for 2030 is $3.79 - $4.63, with an optimistic scenario of $4.63 - $5.55.
Q6: What are the main risks associated with investing in FIL and NEAR?
A: Both face market risks due to cryptocurrency volatility. FIL has technical risks related to scalability and network stability, while NEAR faces risks from validator concentration and potential security vulnerabilities. Both are subject to evolving regulatory risks.
Q7: How should investors approach allocating between FIL and NEAR?
A: Conservative investors might consider allocating 40% to FIL and 60% to NEAR, while aggressive investors might reverse this ratio. New investors should consider a balanced approach, while experienced investors should allocate based on their risk tolerance and belief in the respective technologies.