#PI The open source is not yet fully completed, but one could say that ninety percent of it is open source. Furthermore, I believe that a three-year lock-up position, with all locked-up assets, is significant; over ninety percent of the pioneers are truly remarkable. This is a silent support that doesn't need to be expressed in words or in the formalistic slogans of "talking loudly." A three-year lock-up position signifies accompanying the PI through dark times while having faith in the development four years later. If the opening price is sky-high, why lock up? It would be meaningless to just sell it directly. However, look at what the project party is doing: reshaping the underlying layer, application programs, payment ports. This payment port is not traditional payment; it is without a central authority. Isn't the significance of the PI wallet clear now? This is why the project party keeps issuing announcements; they must protect their accounts well because this PI wallet in the future can circulate all legal tender, various Crypto Assets, including our PI, etc. One could say that in the next ten years, as long as the project party focuses on this aspect, achieving extreme security and legal compliance in regulation, then everyone, including those from other places, will find it easy to conduct any business on PI, right? This is the significance of ecological development and decentralized payment, which is also what the project party is striving for. As for us, following for six years in advance is our commitment. If you think PI is not good, it has nothing to do with me; what I recognize and find good is good. Time will prove everything; aren't many things meant to be broken? Selling things, did you ever dare to think you could sell them online?