2025-11-16 10:53:51

The origin of the 127,000 Bitcoins from the US side is quite complex.

The civil forfeiture process to seize this batch of coins is riddled with flaws in the evidence chain and legal procedures, and international cooperation is almost nonexistent. Ironically, it was the breach of the mining pool's private key algorithm that led to the theft - this directly contradicts the myth of "absolute security through decentralization." The vulnerabilities at the technical level are laid bare.

This huge sum is likely to go into the national treasury rather than compensate the victims. Behind this is the struggle for interests among major countries in the digital asset field: whoever controls the computing power, whoever holds the authority to interpret the rules, has the pricing power.

For ordinary investors? Two lessons: compliance risk and technical risk are both pitfalls. Don't blindly trust any "absolutely safe" narrative; take care of your own wallet. #特朗普撤销农产品关税 $BTC $BNB

BTC1,54%

ETH0,8%

BNB1,8%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

22 Likes

Reward
22
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

TokenomicsPolice

· 2025-11-16 15:01

In plain terms, this wave of operations in the U.S. is just legal black eating black. The Private Key was compromised? That's really laughable; the myth of Decentralization has completely collapsed. Wait a minute, how did this money end up in the national treasury? What about the victims? The great power game is stepping on retail investors. Managing your Wallet properly is what really matters; don’t believe in any absolute safety, it’s all nonsense.

View OriginalReply0

zkNoob

· 2025-11-16 11:23

So, is the "absolutely safe" claim in the crypto world a lie? I need to quickly check my Wallet. --- The treasury eats coins, and the victims just wait? This script is a bit expensive. --- It's a joke if the Private Key gets cracked, who can we blame? --- Computing Power is the voice of authority, this trap has been played for decades. --- Oh my, I thought self-custody was safe, but it seems that's not the case. --- I feel this is just a new way for countries to fight for territory, and it's still the retail investors who suffer. --- Can the confiscation program with so many loopholes still pass? The laws in the U.S. are so loose. --- "Decentralization" is just a slogan in front of national power, don't believe it. --- Is compliance risk greater than technical risk? I think not, you can't avoid both pits. --- Keep your own coins, you can't rely on anyone.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-beba108d

· 2025-11-16 11:22

Wow, is it again this set of "absolute security" nonsense? It should have been pierced long ago. Computing power is the power of discourse, that's just how it is. Self-custody really can't be lazy, the era of big fish eating small fish has come. This operation... the treasury is about to receive funds again. Decentralization? Ha, that's laughable, it's still those people who call the shots. I've felt there was a problem for a long time, so the Private Key can also be breached? Is mine still safe? I'm just wondering whose coins these really are, it seems like just a big country's little game. A Cold Wallet really is the only way out...

View OriginalReply0

gas_fee_trauma

· 2025-11-16 11:01

Wait, the private key was compromised? Doesn't that mean that on-chain isn't that secure, lol The issue of coins entering the treasury was anticipated long ago, victims? Hehe, just line up Managing your own wallet is the key, don't rely on any institution The civil forfeiture process is indeed a bit arbitrary Decentralization security is a concept that needs to be discussed in context, it's not absolute

View OriginalReply0

MevSandwich

· 2025-11-16 10:58

These 127,000 coins were just washed away under the "legal" pretext, hilarious, with technical loopholes and legal loopholes working hand in hand. Whoever said decentralization is safe should just shut up. It's actually about major powers redefining the discourse. Today they can confiscate Bitcoin, and tomorrow they can seize your assets. Self-managed wallets are really necessary; let's go with hardware wallets. This trap is played so smoothly, as soon as civil procedures are used, evidence is casually presented. To put it bluntly, it's still a power issue; whoever holds the Computing Power has the final say. Technology cannot fulfill the promise of decentralization. Well, it's just another big show of "lawful and regulated" behavior, with the outcome being the state treasury's profits and investors footing the bill.

View OriginalReply0