Critics keep shouting: "It's nothing but pattern-matching!" "Pure statistics, zero real thinking."
They plant their flag, confident and loud: "THIS is the ceiling! Can't break through this wall!"
"Logic? Forget it," they laugh with certainty, then watch it crack problems like it's no big deal.
"Okay fine, but creativity—" they pivot fast, moving the finish line further back.
Every breakthrough gets the same reception: denial, then dismissal, then "well obviously."
The goalpost slides across the field, always just beyond what's already achieved.
Maybe the question isn't what AI can't do— it's why we keep pretending yesterday's impossible is today's trivial.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NFTBlackHole
· 12-08 20:52
This is a typical case of "constantly shifting the goalposts," there are always new excuses to justify it.
View OriginalReply0
DegenWhisperer
· 12-08 20:51
Haha, isn’t this just the same drama we see every day? Critics are always laying bricks and building walls.
It’s always the same routine: first they say it won’t work, then they get proven wrong, and finally they pretend they “knew it all along.”
I think this article really captures human nature— the goalpost is always moving, never satisfied.
View OriginalReply0
DaoGovernanceOfficer
· 12-08 20:48
ngl the goalpost shifting is literally what happens with every major protocol upgrade too... people dismiss quadratic funding until it works, then suddenly "obvious governance design"
Reply0
ContractTester
· 12-08 20:46
Haha, it's that group of people. It's always the same routine every time.
View OriginalReply0
SchroedingerMiner
· 12-08 20:44
Ha, this is a classic case of "moving the goalposts." Every time AI breaks through the previous prediction, a new reason is immediately brought up. There’s always another "impossible" waiting...
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerWallet
· 12-08 20:34
Haha, they're moving the goalposts again. I'm all too familiar with this trick.
View OriginalReply0
LightningSentry
· 12-08 20:29
This is the classic "moving the goalposts" tactic, hilarious. Last year they said it was impossible, this year they say "this isn't real AI," and next year they'll have to come up with a new excuse.
The Shifting Benchmark
Critics keep shouting: "It's nothing but pattern-matching!"
"Pure statistics, zero real thinking."
They plant their flag, confident and loud:
"THIS is the ceiling! Can't break through this wall!"
"Logic? Forget it," they laugh with certainty,
then watch it crack problems like it's no big deal.
"Okay fine, but creativity—" they pivot fast,
moving the finish line further back.
Every breakthrough gets the same reception:
denial, then dismissal, then "well obviously."
The goalpost slides across the field,
always just beyond what's already achieved.
Maybe the question isn't what AI can't do—
it's why we keep pretending yesterday's impossible is today's trivial.