The world's richest man once opened up about what really drove his controversial Twitter acquisition. Money wasn't the motive—he knew the backlash would be brutal. What pushed him forward? A gnawing sense that civilization itself was at a crossroads, and someone had to act. The purchase wasn't a business play. It was something far more personal, almost like a moral imperative he couldn't ignore.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
Gm_Gn_Merchantvip
· 12-09 02:19
Well...sounds nice, but who would believe it? After all this, isn’t it just about wanting to control the narrative?
View OriginalReply0
NFTregrettervip
· 12-09 00:06
Uh, this "civilization is on the brink" line... Is it for real? It sounds like an excuse made up after the fact to cover themselves.
View OriginalReply0
retroactive_airdropvip
· 12-09 00:02
Here we go again with the "saving civilization" talk, seriously bro?
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunter007vip
· 12-08 23:54
It's just moral posturing; they still just want to control the discourse.
View OriginalReply0
Deconstructionistvip
· 12-08 23:50
It's just moral coercion. To put it nicely, it's a sense of mission; to put it bluntly, it's about wanting to control the discourse.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatedThricevip
· 12-08 23:40
Well... that sounds nice, but who really believes their true motives?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)