Washington's annual blockchain policy gathering just exposed some serious cracks in the industry's united front.
At the association's summit today, crypto leaders couldn't hide their growing split over regulatory strategy. One camp is pushing hard for market structure legislation—willing to accept almost any framework just to get something passed. Meanwhile, another faction is drawing a line in the sand, publicly stating they'd prefer no legislation at all over poorly designed rules.
The "take what we can get" versus "hold out for quality" debate isn't just philosophical anymore. It's shaping how the industry approaches lawmakers and could determine whether we end up with meaningful regulation or a rushed mess that haunts the space for years.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SilentObserver
· 12-11 22:25
This is what I mean. The crypto community is like this—once regulation comes into play, everyone starts acting independently.
View OriginalReply0
SandwichTrader
· 12-11 02:00
The moderates and hardliners have finally torn each other apart. Now, this should be interesting.
View OriginalReply0
Whale_Whisperer
· 12-09 02:57
That's why I've long said not to expect unity in the crypto community... everyone has their own agenda.
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsTinfoilHat
· 12-09 02:56
Infighting again, that's just the norm in crypto, haha.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingersFOMO
· 12-09 02:45
Here we go again, the crypto community is infighting... The compromisers and the hardliners just can't convince each other.
Washington's annual blockchain policy gathering just exposed some serious cracks in the industry's united front.
At the association's summit today, crypto leaders couldn't hide their growing split over regulatory strategy. One camp is pushing hard for market structure legislation—willing to accept almost any framework just to get something passed. Meanwhile, another faction is drawing a line in the sand, publicly stating they'd prefer no legislation at all over poorly designed rules.
The "take what we can get" versus "hold out for quality" debate isn't just philosophical anymore. It's shaping how the industry approaches lawmakers and could determine whether we end up with meaningful regulation or a rushed mess that haunts the space for years.