If those 67 PvP projects had pooled their trading volume together? We'd be looking at a single token hitting $200M+ market cap easily, with real user adoption to back it up.
But nope. Instead we got 20 fragmented versions splitting everything thin. Classic case of liquidity getting murdered by unnecessary forks.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
19 Likes
Reward
19
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
Rugpull幸存者
· 11h ago
Splitting is just harvesting the leeks.
View OriginalReply0
hodl_therapist
· 21h ago
See the project's internal competition again
View OriginalReply0
NftBankruptcyClub
· 12-09 10:04
A complete mess of retail investors being fleeced
View OriginalReply0
WalletDetective
· 12-09 10:02
The volume is too dispersed; it won't work.
View OriginalReply0
FUDwatcher
· 12-09 10:00
Decentralization is a dead end.
View OriginalReply0
AllInAlice
· 12-09 09:52
Might as well merge the projects.
View OriginalReply0
TokenRationEater
· 12-09 09:45
Division leads to inevitable defeat; unity brings strength.
If those 67 PvP projects had pooled their trading volume together? We'd be looking at a single token hitting $200M+ market cap easily, with real user adoption to back it up.
But nope. Instead we got 20 fragmented versions splitting everything thin. Classic case of liquidity getting murdered by unnecessary forks.