Looks like the crypto legislative push in the U.S. might be stuck in neutral for a while. Senator Booker's take? Without Democrats filling key slots at the CFTC and SEC, any major crypto bill faces an uphill battle. The regulatory vacuum means bipartisan momentum just isn't there yet. It's a waiting game now—until those appointments happen, expect the legislative machine to keep spinning its wheels. Regulatory clarity? Still on hold.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DegenRecoveryGroup
· 18h ago
Honestly, do we have to wait again? With the regulatory department's personnel not in place, our bill will just keep lying dormant...
View OriginalReply0
ETHReserveBank
· 18h ago
What are you waiting for? This situation has been obvious for a while. If the Democrats don't put someone in, don't expect any big moves. Bipartisan cooperation? Ha, keep dreaming—each party is just doing its own thing.
View OriginalReply0
shadowy_supercoder
· 18h ago
This regulation is really sluggish... Someone should have taken action a long time ago.
View OriginalReply0
VitalikFanAccount
· 18h ago
Have to wait again? Feels like the day we get our turn to eat will never come.
View OriginalReply0
MergeConflict
· 18h ago
NGL, this is just political wrangling. Without Democrats, the SEC and CFTC can't do anything—it’s a joke.
Looks like the crypto legislative push in the U.S. might be stuck in neutral for a while. Senator Booker's take? Without Democrats filling key slots at the CFTC and SEC, any major crypto bill faces an uphill battle. The regulatory vacuum means bipartisan momentum just isn't there yet. It's a waiting game now—until those appointments happen, expect the legislative machine to keep spinning its wheels. Regulatory clarity? Still on hold.