Recently, we have observed that the duration of certain popular narratives is shortening, and the ceiling is constantly moving downward. In the early days, I can understand the logic of laying out low-level chips in the market value range of $100,000 to $1 million, and amplifying returns through swings.
But what puzzles me is why there is still a lot of money pouring in after breaking through the $1 million or even $5 million market cap? And it's a round after a round. Is this risk-return ratio really cost-effective? Or is everyone's risk tolerance so strong?
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Recently, we have observed that the duration of certain popular narratives is shortening, and the ceiling is constantly moving downward. In the early days, I can understand the logic of laying out low-level chips in the market value range of $100,000 to $1 million, and amplifying returns through swings.
But what puzzles me is why there is still a lot of money pouring in after breaking through the $1 million or even $5 million market cap? And it's a round after a round. Is this risk-return ratio really cost-effective? Or is everyone's risk tolerance so strong?