After watching Saylor's speech in Dubai, the biggest feeling is that the narrative has completely changed - BTC is no longer as simple as 'digital gold'. He directly described it as the infrastructure layer of global digital capital, and this argument can be established by the wind direction of Wall Street banks and some policy levels.



What's even more ruthless is MicroStrategy's gameplay. They used the BTC treasury as the base, superimposed digital credit products such as STRC, and created an annualized 'account' with an annualized rate of 10% and tax deferred - which is simply a dimensionality reduction blow to the 0%-4% deposit interest rate of traditional banks. Volatility? They dismantled this problem very clearly: those who can withstand volatility directly hold assets to earn capital appreciation, and those who cannot afford it buy credit products to get fixed income.

The current situation is actually quite clear - the question is no longer 'should I allocate BTC', but what role do you want to play in this new set of rules: capital holders, credit investors, or continue to idle in the traditional financial system?
BTC-1.32%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
APY追逐者vip
· 11h ago
The annualized rate of 10% really can't hold back, and the interest of traditional banks is simply insulting, and now the problem has indeed become how to choose to take sides
View OriginalReply0
RunWhenCutvip
· 11h ago
Ha, is it really fake, can the tax be deferred at 10% annualized? This combination is really ruthless, no wonder Saylor is so hilarious there
View OriginalReply0
RumbleValidatorvip
· 11h ago
Saylor's narrative shift is indeed ruthless, but the key is the stability of the validation layer - BTC is the infrastructure, the node consensus mechanism is the real competitiveness, and Wall Street's endorsement is just the icing on the cake. MicroStrategy's 10% annualized rate sounds fragrant, but I am more concerned about the credibility of the underlying assets and network reliability - without sufficient validator support, any financial innovation is a castle in the air. The problem has changed, but at the end of the day, it still depends on whether you can withstand systemic risk, not just price fluctuations. All three roles have technical costs, don't be fooled by the revenue figures, deep operation and maintenance experience is the watershed. In this round of big narrative, the real opportunity is given to those who understand the consensus mechanism - others are just old wine in new bottles. The entry of Wall Street does not mean that the essence of BTC has changed, but more people are beginning to face up to its systemic value. Are you betting on the stability of Saylor's gameplay or the decentralization of BTC itself? These two are not the same thing.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)