At the Solana ecological event, I saw a very interesting phenomenon - a project did not single-handedly support the field this time, but directly pulled a vote of partners to form a group.
Web3 talks about the logic of open collaboration and ecological interconnection. A project is outdated behind closed doors, and now it depends on who can integrate resources and bring the community atmosphere up.
There have been a lot of such offline gatherings in Abu Dhabi recently, and all kinds of ecological parties are grabbing attention. To be honest, teams that can do solid partnerships and are full of on-site energy are indeed more likely to stand out in this wave of competition.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
4 Likes
Reward
4
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LightningAllInHero
· 5h ago
The projects that come in groups are indeed more playful
Huddling for warmth is the king, and working alone has long since died
This is the true meaning of ecological cooperation, not just lip service
The energy of the scene is always those teams, which is a bit interesting
The more partners, the easier it is to get out of the circle, and this wave is right
Solana's gameplay is indeed evolving, and cooperation > going it alone
Team integration ability is the core competitiveness
Whoever has the most cp in the offline scene wins
Abu Dhabi's ecological firepower is really fierce
It's time to reflect on those who work behind closed doors, really
Those who can stand out are all masters of resource integration
I am convinced of this kind of group play
View OriginalReply0
BridgeNomad
· 5h ago
ngl, ecosystem coordination sounds nice on paper... but remember when every "strategic partnership" was just liquidity fragmentation waiting to happen? seen too many tvl migrations go sideways when counter-party risk gets glossed over during the hype phase. curious what their actual trust assumptions are here
Reply0
RumbleValidator
· 6h ago
This is called sustainable ecological design, and a single node alone cannot support the situation
View OriginalReply0
FunGibleTom
· 6h ago
The move of huddling is really ruthless, who will watch it alone
Now it is true that it has to rely on ecological linkage to survive, and individual combat has long been eliminated
Abu Dhabi is really hot, and we have to keep up with the rhythm
Whether the partner is reliable or not, you can see at a glance on the spot
This way of forming a group is what Web3 should look like, achieving each other
Resource integration ability is king, and bragging is useless
It seems that ecological relations have to be maintained, and the era of going it alone has passed
It is indeed easy for a team with strong execution to stand out, as can be seen in this event
If the ecological cooperation is done well, the communication effect will be doubled
It is normal for peers to huddle against each other, and if they don't follow the trend, they will suffer
At the Solana ecological event, I saw a very interesting phenomenon - a project did not single-handedly support the field this time, but directly pulled a vote of partners to form a group.
Web3 talks about the logic of open collaboration and ecological interconnection. A project is outdated behind closed doors, and now it depends on who can integrate resources and bring the community atmosphere up.
There have been a lot of such offline gatherings in Abu Dhabi recently, and all kinds of ecological parties are grabbing attention. To be honest, teams that can do solid partnerships and are full of on-site energy are indeed more likely to stand out in this wave of competition.