Think about it this way: gold represents metallic capital. Real estate? That's property capital. The S&P 500 captures equity capital. So what's Bitcoin? It's digital capital in its purest form.



Someone recently laid out this framework, and honestly, it clicks. BTC isn't trying to be another payment method or just some speculative token. It's positioning itself as a fundamental asset class—digital scarcity meeting monetary principles.

The bold part? The prediction that Bitcoin will eventually hit $1,000,000. Not tomorrow, not next month. But the thesis argues that as more institutions recognize this digital capital narrative, the trajectory becomes inevitable. Whether you buy that target or not, the reframing of what Bitcoin actually represents is worth chewing on. We're watching asset allocation theory get rewritten in real time.
BTC1.65%
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
WalletDoomsDayvip
· 4h ago
There is indeed something about this framework, and I am not tired of listening to the perspective of digital capital $1 million? I believe but don't rush, institutional admission is the key Pure scarcity sexual gameplay, someone finally made it clear This wave of analysis of the paper is much more reliable than most big V Digital capital... Sounds ten times more advanced than "virtual currency"
View OriginalReply0
VCsSuckMyLiquidityvip
· 5h ago
$1 million? Okay, then I'll go all the stud now, waiting to be harvested --- The digital capital framework is indeed logically self-consistent, but institutions will still change their minds when it really lands --- Another "inevitable" prophecy, I was a little tired of hearing it, brother --- I'm tired of hearing the reason for scarcity, and the key is to see who takes the last baton --- Pure digital capital? So why does it kneel every time the supervisor makes a move, isn't it quite pure? --- This logic can justify itself, but do institutions really think so? I'll put a question mark on it --- Just redefine the asset class, history is always rewritten by the winners anyway --- Wait, is it possible for the author of this paper to take a heavy position himself? 😏 --- To put it nicely, it is actually casino psychology, but it is packaged more advanced
View OriginalReply0
ChainSpyvip
· 5h ago
This framework is indeed absolute, and I got the statement of digital capital 1 million dollars... Take your time, the institution is still realizing Pure scarcity gameplay is indeed different Asset theory rewritten, let's be considered witnesses If there is nothing wrong with it, it depends on when the institution really understands it This is the positioning that BTC should have, not a set of payment tools
View OriginalReply0
OldLeekNewSicklevip
· 5h ago
$1 million? This is the standard "narrative premium"... Every time an institution comes in, you have to make up a new story, just listen to it, don't take it seriously. However, the rhetoric of "digital capital" is indeed powerful, much easier to use than the "payment revolution"
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)