Early Bitcoin distribution from 2009 to 2013 created a concentration problem that still impacts price dynamics. Meanwhile, Pi Network kicked off with 60 million participants right from the start—no need for ASIC farms burning through electricity like there's no tomorrow.
One relied on hardware wars and energy waste. The other? Built on accessibility. You don't need expensive rigs or technical know-how to get involved. Just a different approach to how crypto networks can grow. And yeah, anyone can jump in without spending a dime.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
20 Likes
Reward
20
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BTCWaveRider
· 12-11 00:59
Laughing out loud, the Pi Network's claims are so repetitive they've become numb to the ears. Can it really challenge Bitcoin?
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-c802f0e8
· 12-10 20:52
Speaking of Pi Network, it sounds pretty good, but can it actually be implemented? I'm more concerned about when we can start trading for real. Right now, it still depends on the mainnet launch. Anyway, early Bitcoin folks already had the advantage, so those of us later on need to find a way.
View OriginalReply0
ForkThisDAO
· 12-10 08:55
I'm tired of hearing the rhetoric of Pi Network, Bitcoin was indeed centralized in the early days, but people have really been running for more than ten years, what about pi? Still playing on the testnet haha
View OriginalReply0
UnluckyValidator
· 12-10 08:55
Listen, Pi's statement sounds good, but 60 million people dig together? How do I feel more outrageous than ASIC mines... Who is really using it?
View OriginalReply0
TheShibaWhisperer
· 12-10 08:47
I have heard this rhetoric too many times, and the early participants still cut leeks, so don't be brainwashed by "everyone can participate"
View OriginalReply0
RiddleMaster
· 12-10 08:36
Wait, are the 60 million participants of Pi Network serious? How do I feel like this number is a bit watery
Early Bitcoin distribution from 2009 to 2013 created a concentration problem that still impacts price dynamics. Meanwhile, Pi Network kicked off with 60 million participants right from the start—no need for ASIC farms burning through electricity like there's no tomorrow.
One relied on hardware wars and energy waste. The other? Built on accessibility. You don't need expensive rigs or technical know-how to get involved. Just a different approach to how crypto networks can grow. And yeah, anyone can jump in without spending a dime.