Found an interesting on-chain association:



Do you remember the earliest CA (0x9972ab903b5cacb4b9c865e32328763ec8b34444) of the Spring Festival Gala stalk?

Just took off that plate (0x58aa21284b7623e68080ab6af71656c8e5834444), his DEV wallet was 0xb8bb9cb8dbc551533f091dd2f5229d41ab56d8f7.

After checking the records, this guy bought the token of the first CA before, and then turned around and opened a project with the same name.

This timeline and operation method make me wonder - the DEV of the first plate may know something in advance.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
FOMOrektGuyvip
· 6h ago
Oops, after inspecting this chain, there's definitely something going on. Feels like it's about to explode. --- The trading pattern is so consistent, I think this guy's not just a coincidence. --- Buy first, then open, this rhythm is a bit too smooth. --- I just want to know if these two CAs are operated by the same group behind the scenes. --- Now it's good, another round of being forked. I bet five bucks that next month will be the same old routine. --- So this is the classic trick on the chain, buy a test to dip your toes in, then create a renamed version. --- Damn, once I match these details, the DEV really didn't run away.
View OriginalReply0
SerumSurfervip
· 7h ago
Oh no, I've seen this move too many times, it's a routine. --- It's the same old story, first take over as the bagholder then open your own position, a classic three-step ritual of slicing the leeks. --- Damn, is it really the same person? Then the first move was definitely his setup. --- Wait, does this timeline match up? Doesn't that mean I got cut twice? --- Alright, I’ve just uncovered a new tactic. Next time I see this kind of move, I’ll just avoid it. --- No, this guy is so obvious but still dares to do it. It's clear on the blockchain. --- That's why I only watch the overall market. Small coins are too deep and complicated. --- Damn, I knew something was off with this project. Turns out people had already laid the trap early. --- Is it possible that it’s just a coincidence? Or is there really no secrets on the chain? --- This technique is truly brilliant—cut once, then cut again. I need to note down this CA.
View OriginalReply0
MintMastervip
· 7h ago
Damn, this wave of associations is excellent, there is indeed something Damn, this operation method is really unreasonable, it must be an insider No, no, this timeline is too right, how could it be a coincidence This DEV is too showy, I bought a lot and then ran to open the same plate? Outrageous I really remember the plate of the Spring Festival Gala, but I didn't expect the water to be so deep This guy is really not afraid of being picked, and he can find anything on the chain I feel like I have discovered another insider operation site
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)