AlignerZ is building a quite interesting value engine. Their TVS model (Total Value Staked) directly reflects the true attractiveness of the ecosystem — numbers don't lie.
The higher the staking amount, the more stable the network.
This is not just about liquidity accumulation, but also about participants' long-term commitment. When users are willing to lock assets into the system, it indicates that they see more than just short-term gains—they believe in the growth potential of the entire protocol. This alignment mechanism is what early Web3 projects truly need to demonstrate.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TokenDustCollector
· 12-10 10:03
TVS is high, but it depends whether it's backed by real money or just air coins... How far can this AlignerZ set go?
View OriginalReply0
HappyToBeDumped
· 12-10 10:03
What’s the use of TVS numbers looking good? The key is to look at the actual number of people cashing out.
View OriginalReply0
ShitcoinConnoisseur
· 12-10 10:03
TVS numbers look good, but what's really important is whether the actual funds coming in are from institutions or retail investors cutting leeks.
View OriginalReply0
FOMOmonster
· 12-10 10:03
Is TVS really stable? I feel like it still depends on which coin is locked...
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-0717ab66
· 12-10 09:46
TVS does show some backbone, but don't forget that many of the locked positions are also institutions pouring money in for arbitrage. How many true believers are there really?
View OriginalReply0
NftRegretMachine
· 12-10 09:38
TVS this thing can indeed reflect some information, but don't be too superstitious about the numbers. Large lock-up whales also look good when they cut leeks.
Staking more ≠ a good ecosystem; the key is whether there are real applications running behind.
AlignerZ's mechanism is good, but I've heard too many early projects make this kind of promise.
AlignerZ is building a quite interesting value engine. Their TVS model (Total Value Staked) directly reflects the true attractiveness of the ecosystem — numbers don't lie.
The higher the staking amount, the more stable the network.
This is not just about liquidity accumulation, but also about participants' long-term commitment. When users are willing to lock assets into the system, it indicates that they see more than just short-term gains—they believe in the growth potential of the entire protocol. This alignment mechanism is what early Web3 projects truly need to demonstrate.