I saw the news about a project launching this morning, honestly quite surprised.
What exactly is the criteria for selecting coins? Is it just community popularity? Those meme project teams that have been working diligently, continuously building the ecosystem and maintaining the community, somehow can't compare to traffic generated by a tweet with a spelling mistake?
The filtering logic for projects in the BSC ecosystem is baffling. Just a few days ago, there was a discussion about focusing on project quality on the platform, and now it's like this? Say one thing and do another—are they just shooting themselves in the foot?
Hopefully, we can see more transparent listing standards so that the teams truly building and contributing don't feel disheartened.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MeaninglessApe
· 23h ago
Quality was supposed to be the top priority, but it was immediately slapped in the face by popularity. Laughing.
View OriginalReply0
OfflineNewbie
· 23h ago
Basically, it's all about chasing the hype. With such chaotic logic, how can they still boast about quality filtering?
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatorFlash
· 23h ago
This listing logic... the collateralization ratio is almost falling below the threshold, yet you're still randomly selecting projects. The liquidation risk will inevitably skyrocket.
I saw the news about a project launching this morning, honestly quite surprised.
What exactly is the criteria for selecting coins? Is it just community popularity? Those meme project teams that have been working diligently, continuously building the ecosystem and maintaining the community, somehow can't compare to traffic generated by a tweet with a spelling mistake?
The filtering logic for projects in the BSC ecosystem is baffling. Just a few days ago, there was a discussion about focusing on project quality on the platform, and now it's like this? Say one thing and do another—are they just shooting themselves in the foot?
Hopefully, we can see more transparent listing standards so that the teams truly building and contributing don't feel disheartened.