Wait, THE Nature journal just pulled a massive climate paper?
Yep. That German Potsdam Institute study everyone cited last year—the one screaming "$38 trillion annual damage by 2049"—just got yanked. Retracted. Gone.
Guess those doomsday numbers weren't holding up under scrutiny. Makes you wonder what other "settled science" is built on shaky ground. When even peer-reviewed journals start eating their own headlines, trust becomes the real scarce asset.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AlphaWhisperer
· 22h ago
Huh? 38 trillion is gone just like that? Laughing to death, this is why I don't trust these big numbers
What about scientific integrity? Where's the promised peer review?
Nature has started retracting papers, how many more are hanging by a thread?
End-of-the-world predictions like this are made one after another, scare people and then delete the posts
What was said? This is the real FUD, haha
The paper has been eaten up, and trust can't be eaten out either
Wait, is this science or marketing?
View OriginalReply0
FantasyGuardian
· 22h ago
Whoa, 38 trillion just evaporated? Does this make the scientific community feel embarrassed?
View OriginalReply0
HalfBuddhaMoney
· 22h ago
Haha, this is getting interesting. The $38 trillion Bitcoin is gone just like that.
Scientific consensus can also be overturned. Who would have thought?
Peer review, huh? It feels more and more like a rubber stamp.
Data can lie, and reviewers can also turn a blind eye.
Really, now we have to question all information, including those with an aura of authority.
This move indeed reminds us that many things are just "close enough."
But on the other hand, the retraction of papers also shows that the system is still self-correcting. That's a good thing, right?
Gossip always lags behind the truth by a beat.
View OriginalReply0
SeeYouInFourYears
· 22h ago
Haha, that's awkward. 38 trillion dollars just disappeared like that.
---
So what is the status of those reports that cited this paper now?
---
Another "consensus science" got called out, but Web3 folks have long been used to this.
---
Wait, did they really just withdraw it directly? No explanation given?
---
Wow, peer review has become peer deletion.
---
That's why I don't trust any numbers from big institutions.
---
Even Nature is starting to shift blame, indeed.
Wait, THE Nature journal just pulled a massive climate paper?
Yep. That German Potsdam Institute study everyone cited last year—the one screaming "$38 trillion annual damage by 2049"—just got yanked. Retracted. Gone.
Guess those doomsday numbers weren't holding up under scrutiny. Makes you wonder what other "settled science" is built on shaky ground. When even peer-reviewed journals start eating their own headlines, trust becomes the real scarce asset.