The wave of intelligent agents is coming on strong, but to be honest, security issues have always been a big pitfall. AI mishandling funds, occasionally hallucinating and talking nonsense, centralized AI's "black box operations" that make it impossible to understand—these issues have discouraged many people.
Recently, I looked through the AINFT white paper, and they introduced some new ideas in governance structure. The core is a mechanism called "Verifiable Reasoning," which is essentially a transparent monitoring system for AI agents. You can see how it thinks and makes decisions at every step, no longer a "trust me" black box logic.
This design actually hits the nail on the head—Web3 has always emphasized trustlessness, and AI needs to operate on-chain. It should present some verifiable data, right? Otherwise, why would users hand over their wallets to an algorithm they can't understand?
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LightningClicker
· 13h ago
Verifiable reasoning really hits the spot; finally someone cares about the transparency of on-chain agents.
To put it simply, black-box AI is a breach of trust. Who dares to really give it their wallet?
The AINFT approach this time is pretty good, at least moving in the right direction.
Those previous cases of out-of-control losses were really frightening. With a traceable decision-making chain this time, I can feel more at ease.
View OriginalReply0
ColdWalletAnxiety
· 13h ago
Verifiable reasoning must indeed be emphasized; black-box operations should have been broken long ago.
---
Finally, someone is playing seriously. Transparency can't just stay on paper.
---
Wait, even after verification, we still need to trust the code, right? It still seems unavoidable.
---
This round is quite impressive, much better than those who boast extravagantly.
---
Exactly, who would dare give their wallet to something they can't understand? Pure gift.
---
Verifiable ≠ Trusted. It's still better to be cautious.
---
The white paper looks good, but it’s a different story when it actually runs.
---
Decentralized AI is the right direction; now it’s just a matter of how to implement it.
View OriginalReply0
PriceOracleFairy
· 13h ago
verifiable reasoning sounds nice on paper but ngl the real bottleneck is execution latency... every proof step tanks throughput and suddenly your agent's slower than my grandma's wallet. AINFT's onto something tho, that transparency angle could actually flip the script on oracle manipulation—least you can't gaslight the blockchain lmao
Reply0
CoconutWaterBoy
· 13h ago
Verifiable reasoning sounds good, but can it really be implemented and run smoothly when launched?
---
Black-box operations have trapped too many people. I want to see how the AINFT idea works out.
---
It sounds nice, but in the end it's just another new concept for hype.
---
Will increased transparency lead to decreased performance? That's the real key.
---
Web3 + AI is a perfect match, but I'm worried it will just become another concept without real implementation.
---
Installing monitoring systems on AI? That sounds like shackling intelligent agents.
The wave of intelligent agents is coming on strong, but to be honest, security issues have always been a big pitfall. AI mishandling funds, occasionally hallucinating and talking nonsense, centralized AI's "black box operations" that make it impossible to understand—these issues have discouraged many people.
Recently, I looked through the AINFT white paper, and they introduced some new ideas in governance structure. The core is a mechanism called "Verifiable Reasoning," which is essentially a transparent monitoring system for AI agents. You can see how it thinks and makes decisions at every step, no longer a "trust me" black box logic.
This design actually hits the nail on the head—Web3 has always emphasized trustlessness, and AI needs to operate on-chain. It should present some verifiable data, right? Otherwise, why would users hand over their wallets to an algorithm they can't understand?