2025-12-10 11:34:46

Recently, $WET (HumidiFi) has been quite popular, reportedly capturing 40% of the Solana dark pool trading volume. A lot of trading occurs off-chain, and ordinary people can't see the full picture.

However, I wouldn't touch this coin. During its initial launch, bots rushed to buy, the token distribution plan was questioned, and the concentration of tokens was outrageously high. The product itself might have some potential, but the token design is really terrible, making it not a good investment target.

On the contrary, today Kraken listed $LAVA (Lava Network). Not many people know about it. Comparing the two projects is quite interesting — one is a hot topic but has flaws in its token economics, and the other is a low-profile new player on the exchange. The market often works this way; hype and value are often misaligned.

WET-17.15%

LAVA-33.99%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

8 Likes

Reward
8
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DefiEngineerJack

· 21h ago

honestly the $WET tokenomics are fundamentally broken... like, 40% dark pool dominance doesn't mean anything if 80% of supply's sitting with bots and insiders lmao

Reply0

MetaReckt

· 21h ago

Dark pools 40%? Sounds impressive, but so many trades are invisible... What are we afraid of? As soon as the bots started snatching up, I knew this coin was done, tokenomics with a bad foundation is doomed. LAVA, on the other hand, is not getting attention? This might be the real opportunity, as the market always goes against the trend.

View OriginalReply0

MEVHunterZhang

· 21h ago

WET, I'm very familiar with their tricks. Dark pools hide a lot of dirty work. Bots抢盘, chips piling up mountain-high, this is just a game of hot potato. LAVA is indeed low-key, but I prefer this kind of quiet launch. Hype = trap, this is a painful lesson.

View OriginalReply0

TommyTeacher1

· 21h ago

WET this thing is just a shady pool for chopping leeks, a bunch of bots grabbing chips—I saw through it a long time ago. LAVA, on the other hand, is so low-key that it's actually comfortable; this is the right attitude. The topic popularity can't compete with tokenomics—wake up, everyone.

View OriginalReply0

SoliditySurvivor

· 21h ago

WET's dark pool share of 40% sounds intimidating, but with bots snatching orders and concentrated chips, isn't this just a typical pump-and-dump scheme... LAVA has indeed been overlooked; launching quietly feels more solid. I still prefer projects that don't rely on hype to survive. High popularity ≠ profit. I have to remind myself of this repeatedly, haha. WET's economic design is really garbage; no matter how good the data looks, it can't save it... The fact that dark pool trading volume accounts for 40% is suspicious in itself. Without seeing the full picture, I wouldn't dare to touch it. The low-profile LAVA actually makes me a bit interested; at least it doesn't feel so manipulated by whales.

View OriginalReply0

Trending TopicsView More
#FedRateCutPrediction
47.67K Popularity
#PostonSquaretoEarn$50
47.01K Popularity
#CryptoMarketRebound
307.86K Popularity
#SUIETFLaunched
11.85K Popularity
#BitcoinActivityPicksUp
10.53K Popularity

Hot Gate FunView More

1
GPANDAGPANDA
MC:$3.71KHolders:2
0.50%
2
GlooGloo
MC:$3.56KHolders:1
0.00%
3
GLXGLX
MC:$3.56KHolders:1
0.00%
4
MGMerry Christmas Gate
MC:$4.02KHolders:3
1.96%
5
DOYRDOYR
MC:$3.61KHolders:1
0.00%

Sitemap