I just translated the official documentation of a certain project and found an interesting point.
The documentation clearly states that there is only one condition for participation and contribution—having contributions. Just this one sentence feels like saying "To breathe air, the condition is that you must breathe."
Can such a circular definition be included in official documentation? I don't know if it's an intentional blank space left for the community to interpret freely or if the team really hasn't figured out the contribution standards. Anyway, I was a bit confused after reading it.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
22 Likes
Reward
22
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MonkeySeeMonkeyDo
· 12h ago
Haha, how much slack do you have to cut to write this document? The cycle definitions are played with expertly.
View OriginalReply0
DeadTrades_Walking
· 12-11 23:56
Haha, what kind of logic is this, "must have contributions to contribute"... Is the team joking around or just haven't figured it out yet?
View OriginalReply0
WalletDoomsDay
· 12-11 20:55
Ha, this official documentation is ridiculously written, it's like they didn't say anything at all.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainHolmes
· 12-10 13:00
Haha, this logic is really brilliant, the documentation is written like a brain teaser.
View OriginalReply0
FlatlineTrader
· 12-10 12:58
Haha, this definition is hilarious, just like not saying anything.
View OriginalReply0
FarmToRiches
· 12-10 12:52
Really, the quality of this document is outrageous. To put it plainly, they didn't think it through and are just pretending to be serious.
View OriginalReply0
RetiredMiner
· 12-10 12:40
Haha, this logic is brilliant, just like talking nonsense.
View OriginalReply0
AllInAlice
· 12-10 12:39
Haha, this document is really awesome. The circular definitions are written so majestically.
I just translated the official documentation of a certain project and found an interesting point.
The documentation clearly states that there is only one condition for participation and contribution—having contributions. Just this one sentence feels like saying "To breathe air, the condition is that you must breathe."
Can such a circular definition be included in official documentation? I don't know if it's an intentional blank space left for the community to interpret freely or if the team really hasn't figured out the contribution standards. Anyway, I was a bit confused after reading it.