Stretching a mortgage to half a century? Sounds tempting when monthly payments drop, but here's the harsh reality nobody wants to admit: you're not solving the affordability crisis—you're just postponing the pain.
Think about it. Lower monthly chunks might feel manageable now, but you'll be hemorrhaging interest for decades. By the time you're supposed to be enjoying retirement, you're still chained to debt. That dream of financial freedom at 65? Forget it. You'll be 80 and still making payments.
The math is brutal. A 50-year term means you're paying interest on interest on interest. Sure, the bank loves it—they're raking in profit while you're getting older. Meanwhile, your peers who bit the bullet with shorter terms? They're debt-free, building actual wealth, maybe even dabbling in alternative assets.
Housing costs won't magically shrink because you spread payments thinner. The price tag stays sky-high; you're just agreeing to bleed slower. And when inflation hits or rates shift? You're locked in for the long haul, watching your purchasing power erode.
Bottom line: if you can't afford it in 30 years, a 50-year Band-Aid won't fix the underlying wound. It might even guarantee you're working well past retirement age just to keep a roof overhead.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
FOMOmonster
· 3h ago
50-year mortgage? Uh... isn't that just slow suicide?
---
Really, having a lower monthly payment feels good, but you're playing a game of "interest on interest" with the bank. By the time you retire, you might still be in debt, isn't that nonsense?
---
Sounds tempting, but honestly it's just self-deception. Housing prices aren't cheap to begin with; you're just changing the way you go bankrupt.
---
Still paying off your mortgage at 80... buddy, your dream is a bit unrealistic.
---
So the real problem is that the house is unaffordable in the first place; a 50-year loan won't save you. That's the real issue, right?
---
The bank is laughing to death. You're still in debt, I'm still in debt, we're all working for them.
---
If you don't have money to pay, you have to get into the car loan. In the end, that's the outcome—difficult to say, but it's trapping yourself.
---
Looking at those who paid off their mortgage in 30 years and are already financially free, you're still paying interest... something's not right.
View OriginalReply0
rugpull_survivor
· 12-10 13:24
50-year mortgage? Isn't that just slow suicide, and the banks are laughing their heads off.
---
Basically, it's just self-deception. Lower monthly payments make you feel better, but the interest can consume you for a lifetime.
---
Wait, does anyone really sign up for a 50-year mortgage? I need to ask my friends if they are that ruthless.
---
It's the same as those caught in the crypto bear market, waiting for a rebound, but the longer they wait, the worse it gets.
---
Retiring while still paying a mortgage, I’d rather go all-in on some shitcoin.
---
Banks really designed this thing perfectly, squeezing every last drop of blood out of you. Human greed is just being exploited this way.
View OriginalReply0
bridgeOops
· 12-10 13:14
50-year mortgage? Wake up, this is the bank's perfect harvesting machine.
Really, still paying off a mortgage at 80 years old—such a future I refuse to imagine.
View OriginalReply0
Web3ExplorerLin
· 12-10 13:14
hypothesis: what if we're looking at this wrong... 50-year mortgages are basically like locking into a bad smart contract that nobody audited. you're just gradually getting liquidated by compound interest, ngl
Reply0
DataPickledFish
· 12-10 13:12
50-year loan? Uh, isn't that just slow-motion bankruptcy? The banks are laughing their heads off.
---
Honestly, I don’t understand why anyone is still playing with these long-term loans… by the time they retire, it’ll just be a dream.
---
Instead of a 50-year mortgage, it's better to get into the crypto space sooner—at least there's a chance to turn things around.
---
Have you ever seen an 80-year-old still paying off a mortgage? I haven't, but it feels like it's coming soon.
---
Interest on interest on interest… this trick is so old, the banks are the real winners.
---
Lower monthly payments but double the interest? Why do people still fall into this trap when math is so simple?
---
A half-century of being a mortgage slave is better than just diving into Web3 for passive income.
---
If you can't afford it, you just can't afford it. Extending the term doesn’t change that fact.
---
Banks are really good at cutting leeks; this move is brilliant.
---
I just want to know why they don't just trade crypto directly instead of stubbornly fighting over mortgages.
View OriginalReply0
AllTalkLongTrader
· 12-10 13:10
50-year mortgage? Bro, isn't this just prolonging the pain? You're basically sentencing yourself to live in pain.
Wait, do you have to wait until you're 80 to pay it off? That doesn't sound right. How can you retire if you're still paying off the house? You're just working for the bank.
The key is the interest, brother. You’re not saving any money; you're just giving it all to the bank.
Stretching a mortgage to half a century? Sounds tempting when monthly payments drop, but here's the harsh reality nobody wants to admit: you're not solving the affordability crisis—you're just postponing the pain.
Think about it. Lower monthly chunks might feel manageable now, but you'll be hemorrhaging interest for decades. By the time you're supposed to be enjoying retirement, you're still chained to debt. That dream of financial freedom at 65? Forget it. You'll be 80 and still making payments.
The math is brutal. A 50-year term means you're paying interest on interest on interest. Sure, the bank loves it—they're raking in profit while you're getting older. Meanwhile, your peers who bit the bullet with shorter terms? They're debt-free, building actual wealth, maybe even dabbling in alternative assets.
Housing costs won't magically shrink because you spread payments thinner. The price tag stays sky-high; you're just agreeing to bleed slower. And when inflation hits or rates shift? You're locked in for the long haul, watching your purchasing power erode.
Bottom line: if you can't afford it in 30 years, a 50-year Band-Aid won't fix the underlying wound. It might even guarantee you're working well past retirement age just to keep a roof overhead.