There's a new evaluation framework that ditches the old one-time assessment approach. Instead of freezing projects at a single moment, this model watches how they perform on-chain over extended periods.
What gets monitored? Technical achievements and development progress are logged in real-time. But it's not just code—community dynamics matter too. User growth patterns and how actively people engage with the ecosystem both factor into the final rating.
Basically, it's treating project evaluation like a continuous health check rather than a pass/fail exam.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ForkItAllDay
· 12-10 13:48
Finally, someone has got the evaluation thing right. It's way more reliable than the one-shot deal from before.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropDreamer
· 12-10 13:47
Finally, someone is paying attention to long-term performance. It's much more reliable than temporary hype.
View OriginalReply0
DiamondHands
· 12-10 13:39
Someone finally thought of this. One-time assessment is really nonsense.
Now that's called science, engagement is key here.
Selling off assets is okay, but it depends on whether the fundamentals are stable.
Monitoring the community and observing user growth—who guarantees the authenticity of the data?
Compared to those rigid scoring standards, this approach is indeed innovative.
Continuous health checks? Sounds like you're surveilling our holdings, haha.
Code can be deceptive, but the community can't be fooled, I agree.
There's a new evaluation framework that ditches the old one-time assessment approach. Instead of freezing projects at a single moment, this model watches how they perform on-chain over extended periods.
What gets monitored? Technical achievements and development progress are logged in real-time. But it's not just code—community dynamics matter too. User growth patterns and how actively people engage with the ecosystem both factor into the final rating.
Basically, it's treating project evaluation like a continuous health check rather than a pass/fail exam.