This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SeeYouInFourYears
· 21h ago
It's the same old trick again, changing the wrapping paper but still the same flavor of tokens.
---
A quick look at GitHub shows it's all API calls, this is called decentralization haha.
---
Really, entering Web3 AI projects now is like opening a blind box; nine out of ten times, you get the same thing.
---
Honestly, this bubble is even more excessive than the last one, and they've even skipped the technical difficulty of pretending.
---
Ask about "revolution," ask about "ecosystem," and ask again, and you'll get blocked.
---
I just want to know how these project teams feel justified; the amount of code on GitHub can't really hold up.
---
Instead of saying they're working on AI, it's more like doing financial engineering—a different name for opening blind boxes.
---
Data privacy, computing power distribution—these are the real issues, but no one makes money doing that.
View OriginalReply0
PumpDetector
· 12-11 16:59
nah this is exactly the mt gox energy... seen this movie before. wrapper tokens and borrowed apis, same cycle different coat of paint. reading between the lines here and the technicals just don't check out fr
Reply0
GasFeeNightmare
· 12-10 14:48
Ninety percent of projects are just shell companies, I've seen through this long ago. I'm really tired of these people.
---
The more decorative the packaging, the more valuable it seems? Laughing to death, just waiting for a crash.
---
All the code is just copy and paste stuff, and they still dare to call it a revolution.
---
Instead of fantasizing about decentralization, it's better to honestly solve some real problems.
---
How ruthless do you have to be to cut the leek this wave...
---
I just want to know whether these project teams believe in their own stories.
---
A bunch of tokens issuing machines disguised as AI, speechless.
---
The projects that are truly causing trouble have long been buried among this pile of garbage.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunter
· 12-10 14:47
ngl 90% of these "ai web3" projects are just api wrappers with token vending machines... actual garbage tier engineering tbh
Reply0
MEVEye
· 12-10 14:46
Ninety percent of projects are just shell companies with GPT, and their tokens are considered "revolutionary" once launched, it's hilarious.
---
The amount of code is truly less than what scripts have, yet they dare to boast about decentralization, it's ridiculous.
---
Now it's all just packaging, not a single one genuinely solves problems, so annoying.
---
Another round of bubble harvesting, these two buzzwords really know how to make money.
---
Once you peel back the GitHub layers, the true nature is revealed, it's all just scams.
---
Only those who genuinely work on privacy and computational power distribution are worth paying attention to; everything else is pointless.
---
I won't create problems; this industry is sick.
---
Just look at the funding amount and then at the code, it’s laugh-out-loud funny.
---
The Web3 plus AI combo is still the old trick of harvesting user data.
---
The industry needs solutions, not tokens. That’s so true.
View OriginalReply0
NFTArtisanHQ
· 12-10 14:45
you're basically describing the same aesthetic collapse baudrillard warned about—where the simulacrum becomes indistinguishable from the original, except here it's just wrapped tokens pretending at ontological depth. the irony is thick enough to cut through.
Reply0
down_only_larry
· 12-10 14:42
It’s so satisfying to watch, finally someone dares to poke at this cowardice. API skin + tokens just to call it an AI revolution? I wish I could do that too, I can package it as well, but where’s the money?
Really, those projects on GitHub are obviously fragile, I’d rather just write a little tool casually. What’s all this talk about decentralization? In the end, it’s just data black boxes, changing names to keep ripping off investors.
The biggest shortage in this circle is real tech talent; everyone is busy creating concepts. Data privacy and computing power are the real thresholds, but no one is willing to seriously tackle them.
That’s how it is—bubbles keep growing bigger, and in the end, the ones left holding the bag are the bottom-tier retail investors.
View OriginalReply0
gas_fee_trauma
· 12-10 14:41
Laughing out loud, nine out of ten projects are just shell masters, their code volume is even less than weekend scripts, and they're still talking about decentralization.
---
This wave is just old wine in a new bottle; changing the token contract and calling it a revolution—truly amazing.
---
What really hurts is that they haven't thought about solving real problems; they're just thinking about how to cut the next round of leek.
---
Data privacy, computing power allocation—these are the real issues. Now projects are playing tricks, none of them reliable.
---
API packaging + token issuance formulas are so tired; how much longer can they keep scammin'?
---
I really dislike the universal passwords like "AI+" or "Web3+"—as if slapping these two words on it can get funding.
---
Real technical problems are left untouched; everyone is just creating bubbles, industry ailments are quite serious.
---
They dare to raise funds with so little code, just look at the GitHub repositories—it's all a facade.
View OriginalReply0
UncleLiquidation
· 12-10 14:39
Same old tricks again, changing the wrapping paper multiple times but the tokens are still the same
---
Really? Just a quick look on GitHub reveals their true nature, even more shameless than knockoff projects
---
To be honest, I could write the code for these projects with my eyes closed
---
Decentralization? Ha, the data is still completely consumed
---
Instead of shouting slogans, it's better to genuinely solve some problems. Right now, it's all just hype and bubble buildup
---
Speculators love this routine; just a couple of buzzwords and they can raise funds
---
Tired of these superficial packages, just waiting to see someone produce something real
---
Why does everyone keep hyping concepts while no one wants to do real work?
---
The real challenge is in resource allocation, but no one dares to tackle it
---
Laughing out loud, calling it a revolution just because there's an extra layer over GPT-4 API
Recently observing the Web3 AI track, I发现一个让人哭笑不得的现象:九成项目本质上就是把GPT-4的API包装一下,再套个代币发行合约,就敢说自己在搞「AI革命」。
扒开这些项目的GitHub仓库看看?代码量还没我上周末写的脚本多。他们口中的「去中心化智能」,实际运作模式跟传统互联网大厂收集用户数据没啥区别,只是换了个更fancy的包装纸。
真正有意思的项目,应该去解决实际存在的技术难题——比如数据隐私、算力分配、模型训练的去中心化。而不是借着AI和Web3两个热词,炮制新一轮的投机泡沫。
行业需要的是解决方案,不是制造新问题。