A fierce user battle has recently erupted on the chain.



A certain aggregation layer protocol has launched an incentive program called Craterun. The approach is quite straightforward—spend money to attract users. They are offering a $2.5 million cash reward, plus 10% of the project's token supply as an airdrop pool. The goal is clear: to bring over traders who are active on decentralized contract platforms like Hyperliquid.

This kind of aggregation layer positioning is quite interesting; essentially, it provides a more user-friendly interface for DEXs, lowering the user entry barrier. Now, using real cash as incentives aims to poach users from the existing market. $2.5 million is no small amount, and a 10% token share is also quite attractive. This tactic is not uncommon in the DeFi space, but it is indeed quite aggressive.

Ultimately, the number of on-chain contract users is limited; those who offer better experiences and higher yields will attract users. The core of this battle still depends on whether the product can retain users—subsidies alone won't last too long.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
FrogInTheWellvip
· 13h ago
Investing 2.5 million USD basically means burning money to compete for existing users. The winner is the one who can retain talent.
View OriginalReply0
P2ENotWorkingvip
· 13h ago
Is pouring 2.5 million just to steal users? This trick has been played out long ago, and only a few can really survive. --- The subsidies are strong enough, but users are also smart. After earning some rewards, they run away—gamblers' mentality. --- Who's putting on this show again? Craterun? Never heard of it. --- You're right, product experience is the key; throwing money around can only provide short-term anesthesia. --- A 10% token airdrop sounds like a lot, but after dilution, it’s nothing. It still depends on subsequent operations. --- Another aggregation layer is coming to share the pie. Can Hyperliquid really be poached? I doubt it. --- Honestly, prolonged incentive wars end up draining the platform, and no one will be able to make money.
View OriginalReply0
PumpDoctrinevip
· 13h ago
2.5 million USD spent, looks fierce, but really can't keep people Throwing money around is useless if the product isn't good, it'll still run away Why would Hyperliquid users want to switch jobs unless it's truly amazing This round looks like they're burning investors' money, how long can it last? The aggregation layer is everywhere, why think you can win Another subsidy game, as soon as the money runs out, the true nature will be revealed
View OriginalReply0
NFTHoardervip
· 13h ago
Investing 2.5 million dollars, how much confidence does that take? Truly good products wouldn't be so rushed.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)