2025-12-10 14:49:59

Looking back over these years, what is the truly functioning ecosystem in the crypto world?

It seems there is only one underlying logic—centered around the word "gamble."

Initially, everyone played around centralized exchanges, then decentralized exchanges became popular, and later perpetual contract DEXs became the new battleground. And now? Prediction markets are starting to take over.

How many different ways of playing have there been? In fact, the core hasn't changed; they all provide different stages for speculation. Whether it's CEX or PERP, in the end, everyone is after that thrill.

The so-called ecosystem innovation, frankly, is just changing the gambling table. Projects that try to tell a different story? Most of them have become pseudo-propositions, and the market has voted with its feet.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

20 Likes

Reward
20
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DefiPlaybook

· 2025-12-13 10:10

Honestly, this observation hits to the bone. I started by exploiting CEXs, then chased PERP, and now looking at prediction markets... recursive nesting, I just can't stop. Filling the betting tables frequently, but the fate of the gamblers hasn't changed. Where did all those narratives about "changing the world" for public chains go? They were just KO'd by market returns. The problem is, having too many choices for people like us is actually a trap. Liquidity always flows to the highest APY, and no one really cares what your infrastructure actually solves. In fact, this is the fate of our circle—being so competitive that it ultimately becomes a pure financial game. On-chain data will speak.

View OriginalReply0

gm_or_ngmi

· 2025-12-13 00:29

It's too straightforward, but it really hits the point. Just a skin change, no one really wants to do any ecosystem building. --- Predictive markets won't be popular for long, and then it's time to find the next gambling table. Cycle again. --- Listening until my ears are calloused, it's all the same rhetoric with different names. --- Honestly, I just want to know how many projects genuinely want to solve problems, instead of just coming to harvest the leeks. --- Winning the bet makes you a genius; losing it means you should die. That's Web3, right? --- So I don't trust anything now, just follow the hot money. Anyway, the core is the same. --- CEX, DEX, PERP, prediction markets—it's just a name change for the same tricks. I'm dizzy. --- It's a bit tiring; every time I think there's innovation, it turns out to be just another gamble. --- Those storytelling projects are indeed dead; the market doesn't have the patience to listen anymore. --- Speechless, after so many years, I can only summarize it in one sentence.

View OriginalReply0

GhostAddressHunter

· 2025-12-11 19:10

Changing the soup without changing the medicine, that's a very strong statement, but it's also not wrong, haha. The gambling table keeps changing rounds, but the little guys are still the same. Where is the real ecological innovation? That’s the real question. To be honest, I also made some money during the perpetual contract phase, but now looking at the prediction market, it's the same old套路. Projects aiming to create utility tokens have already died; those that are still alive have learned to tell stories and cater to speculation.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunterKing

· 2025-12-11 09:32

Buddy is right. These past few years, I’ve been scraping by on these gambling tables—from CEX to PERP to the current prediction markets. Same old story, just different venues. There’s really no ecological innovation; it’s just the same sheep-herding track rotating. Last year, I even freeloaded a lot of gas fees through contract interactions. Storytelling projects? Definitely scam coins. The market has long since spoken with its feet, brother. --- I almost went bankrupt during the perpetual contract phase, but now I want to give prediction markets another shot. --- Damn, he’s right. It’s just a different gambling table; the core logic hasn’t changed at all. --- So, instead of listening to them talk about ecological innovation, it’s better to look directly at interaction volume and social proof. Those are the real indicators of value. --- I saw through it long ago. Those still playing this game this year probably won’t get much freebies either. It’s all gambler psychology at work. --- No fluff, just truth. Last year, during the PERP craze, I didn’t even bother checking my wallet address; I just went all-in. Now I’m still paying off debts.

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainGriller

· 2025-12-10 15:20

Haha, he's right. It's just a rebranding; essentially, it's a zero-sum game. --- This guy has nailed it. We're just bouncing back and forth between gambling tables. --- Prediction markets? Just another place to harvest the leeks. --- I have deep experience; the only logic that really makes money is this one. Other narratives are just talk. --- The problem is, most people actually enjoy this process. They know it's gambling but still have to participate. --- Isn't the concept of decentralization ultimately serving speculation? That's hilarious.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-5854de8b

· 2025-12-10 15:14

Really, changing the surface but not the essence; it's all just the same casino tactics in the end. --- Predictive markets are just parallel universes of CEX; anyone who believes otherwise is just awkward. --- That hits too close to home... I thought I was investing. --- A healthy ecosystem that makes money is a good ecosystem. Stop with all the nonsense. --- Wait, are you saying I've been gambling all these years? --- Perpetual contracts, predictive markets, no matter what new narratives come up, this fate can't be changed. --- Haha, no problem, the market loves this approach; everything else is just noise. --- Changing the gambling table is innovation. This industry is so honest that I actually feel reassured. --- Ecosystem innovation? Laughable, it's just a different way to cut the leeks. --- Is there a truly functional non-gambling ecosystem out there? Curious.

View OriginalReply0

CoffeeNFTrader

· 2025-12-10 15:10

It's just the same old story, no big deal --- Wake up everyone, just a skin change, no real novelty --- Is the prediction market next? Haha, who will be cut this time --- CEX, DEX, PERP, prediction markets... the套路never changes --- Honestly, it's all about chasing that adrenaline rush --- Innovation? Nonexistent, just playing musical chairs with the game modes --- Does anyone really believe in ecological innovation? The market has already voted --- Always saying this time is different, but it's just fooling ourselves --- Been revolving around the gambling word for so many years, never seen another way out --- So what are we still waiting for? Keep gambling --- Ecological stories are just a front, everything is for that thrill --- Changing the betting table and calling it innovation? Give me a break

View OriginalReply0

HorizonHunter

· 2025-12-10 15:09

Changing the soup but not the medicine, this is the truth about Web3. The gambling table has turned, but it's still the same group of people gambling, so exhausting. Prediction markets? Ha, another new trick to harvest retail investors. Projects that rely on storytelling die really fast; pouring money into speculation is the real way to go. Thinking about it carefully, it's true—any ecological innovation is just bullshit. Back in the day of perpetual contracts, everyone said they would change finance. Now? It's still just gambling.

View OriginalReply0

gaslight_gasfeez

· 2025-12-10 14:53

Honestly, it's just a gambling game with some tricks; the only ecosystem that can run are those based on gambling. Same old story, always looking for the next betting table. CEX, DEX, perpetual contracts, prediction markets—all the same套路, just a new skin for a new ecosystem. Projects truly committed to building ecosystems would have died long ago; the market only recognizes gambling. To be honest, after these years, crypto really boils down to this; overthinking it only leads to losses. Generation after generation of betting tables, and new waves of rookies—it's a cycle that keeps repeating.

View OriginalReply0