Is Australia's ban on social media for kids under 16 actually justified? Some economists are pointing out the policy seems built on shaky data and questionable reasoning. The regulatory approach raises concerns about how governments assess digital platforms—especially when decentralization and user autonomy are increasingly relevant to the conversation.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
FalseProfitProphetvip
· 12-12 20:27
Another government decision made with a big hand gesture, without even sorting out the data before starting the ban... Isn't this a typical case of "I'm the manager, I make the rules"?
View OriginalReply0
QuietlyStakingvip
· 12-10 15:46
Damn, it's that same excuse of "doing it for the kids" again. They haven't even figured out the data properly before starting legislation. I'm tired of this routine.
View OriginalReply0
RugPullAlertBotvip
· 12-10 15:44
Doing this again, the data doesn't even hold up, and you're still shameless enough to ban it? The government really likes to make decisions on a whim.
View OriginalReply0
NonFungibleDegenvip
· 12-10 15:31
ngl australia's just coping hard... show me the actual data tho ser, not vibes and feels. probably nothing but if they start banning crypto next im actually down bad fr fr
Reply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)