AI models can hallucinate facts that never existed.
Some protocols are now cross-checking outputs through multiple AI systems, turning messy predictions into verified data streams.
When different models agree on the same result, confidence shoots up. That's how speculation becomes something you can actually trade on.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
PumpDetector
· 12h ago
lol so basically they're just bullshitting each other until consensus? that's literally what happened before every crash... multiple models agreeing doesn't mean shit, just means the hallucination is synchronized. seen this movie before, not entertaining anymore
Reply0
PerennialLeek
· 12-10 16:07
Can we really trust data confirmed consistently by multiple AI models? Seems like we still need to verify it ourselves...
View OriginalReply0
AirdropAnxiety
· 12-10 16:06
Multi-model consensus sounds reliable, but it still feels like using hallucination to verify hallucination...
View OriginalReply0
ContractSurrender
· 12-10 16:05
Multiple model consensus validation, this idea is pretty good. But the real question is, who ensures that these models themselves are problem-free? Simply stacking systems won't reveal the truth.
View OriginalReply0
AlphaWhisperer
· 12-10 15:47
Multiple AIs corroborating each other can turn fabricated information into "tradeable data"? That's a funny logic.
AI models can hallucinate facts that never existed.
Some protocols are now cross-checking outputs through multiple AI systems, turning messy predictions into verified data streams.
When different models agree on the same result, confidence shoots up. That's how speculation becomes something you can actually trade on.