Recently, I came across the YFSX project, and its gameplay is quite interesting—extremely low issuance combined with 100% deflationary burn. Every on-chain transaction triggers a burn mechanism, continuously reducing the circulating tokens, which theoretically makes the remaining tokens increasingly scarce.
The team has been very pragmatic in their recent actions, avoiding complicated narratives and focusing solely on the "scarcity + deflation" logic. From a tokenomics perspective, if this design can align with real demand, long-term holders might benefit from value capture as supply shrinks. However, deflationary models also carry risks; the key is whether the subsequent ecosystem can support actual application scenarios.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NFTArchaeologis
· 21h ago
The deflationary spiral sounds tempting, but I always think of those early Bitcoin addresses that were locked—scarcity ultimately turned into a tombstone. The logic behind YFSX still depends on whether on-chain activity can hold up.
View OriginalReply0
MEVEye
· 12-10 16:47
Deflation sounds good, but I'm worried it's just a paper logic.
If there's truly no ecosystem, no matter how scarce it is, it's useless.
The team is pragmatic, which is good, but this kind of tokenomics model needs three or five cycles to see clearly.
YFSX is indeed an unfamiliar name. Does it have LP depth, or is it another liquidity desert?
The burn mechanism sounds nice, but the key is how long trading volume can support it. Without trading volume, deflation just becomes a joke.
Wait, is this another "must appreciate" claim? I've heard it too many times.
Super low issuance combined with deflation sounds like tactics used by some early projects; what happened to them in the end?
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityHunter
· 12-10 16:30
Wait, 100% deflationary burn? Burn with every transaction? Will this cause liquidity depth to plummet straight down, with slippage exploding?
Recently, I came across the YFSX project, and its gameplay is quite interesting—extremely low issuance combined with 100% deflationary burn. Every on-chain transaction triggers a burn mechanism, continuously reducing the circulating tokens, which theoretically makes the remaining tokens increasingly scarce.
The team has been very pragmatic in their recent actions, avoiding complicated narratives and focusing solely on the "scarcity + deflation" logic. From a tokenomics perspective, if this design can align with real demand, long-term holders might benefit from value capture as supply shrinks. However, deflationary models also carry risks; the key is whether the subsequent ecosystem can support actual application scenarios.