Still bleeding money on sub-100k market-cap tokens?
Here's the uncomfortable part: it might not be the market that sucks.
Everyone's quick to point fingers—dead liquidity, insider dumps, macro conditions. But let's be real for a second. Throwing darts at micro-caps isn't an edge. It's gambling dressed up as alpha.
The winners you see? That's survivorship bias working overtime. For every moonshot story, there are hundreds quietly rugged.
Maybe the issue isn't out there. Maybe it's the strategy itself.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
VitaliksTwin
· 12-11 01:26
Damn, that hurts... I'm just one of the projects that got drained, haha
View OriginalReply0
MEVVictimAlliance
· 12-10 16:31
Basically, we're just gambling, and yet we have to give it a name like "alpha." It's exciting to see a project with a 100x increase, but we don't see the hundreds that fail behind it.
Still bleeding money on sub-100k market-cap tokens?
Here's the uncomfortable part: it might not be the market that sucks.
Everyone's quick to point fingers—dead liquidity, insider dumps, macro conditions. But let's be real for a second. Throwing darts at micro-caps isn't an edge. It's gambling dressed up as alpha.
The winners you see? That's survivorship bias working overtime. For every moonshot story, there are hundreds quietly rugged.
Maybe the issue isn't out there. Maybe it's the strategy itself.